1. Bock C, Landau C, Orendt M, Schmidt M. Are public financing schemes beneficial for university spin-offs and the technology transfer of innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management 2018; 22 (6): 1- 30. [ DOI:10.1142/S1363919618500524] 2. Ferretti M, Ferri S, Fiorentino R, Parmentola A, Sapio A. Neither absent nor too present: the effects of the engagement of parent universities on the performance of academic spin-offs. Small Bus Econ 2019; 52: 153- 173. [ DOI:10.1007/s11187-018-0022-8] 3. Huynh T, Patton D, Arias-Aranda D, Molina-Fernandez LM. University spin-off's performance: Capabilities and networks of founding teams at creation phase. Journal of Business Research 2017; 78: 10- 22. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.015] 4. Fine M, Davidson B. The marketization of care: Global challenges and national responses in Australia. Current Sociology 2018; 66(4):503-16. [ DOI:10.1177/0011392118765281] 5. Rasiah R, Tumin M, Musafar Hameed L, Ndoma I. Civil Society Organizations in Opposition to Healthcare Commercialization: Protecting Access for the Poor and Middle Class in Malaysia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2016; 46(3):567-85. [ DOI:10.1177/0899764016654571] 6. Civaner M, Balcioglu H, Vatansever K. Medical Students' Opinions about the Commercialization of Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Bioethical Inquiry 2016; 13(2):261-270. [ DOI:10.1007/s11673-016-9704-6] 7. Derrick GE. Integration versus separation: structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations. J Technol Transf 2015; 40(1); 105- 122. [ DOI:10.1007/s10961-014-9343-1] 8. Sapir A, Oliver AL. From academic laboratory to the market: Disclosed and undisclosed narratives of commercialization. Social Studies of Science 2016; 47(1): 33- 52. [ DOI:10.1177/0306312716667647] 9. Lawton Smith H, Bagchi-Sen S, Edmunds L. Innovation cycles and geographies of innovation: A study of healthcare innovation in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies 2018; 25(1):405- 422. [ DOI:10.1177/0969776417716220] 10. Lindahl OA, Andersson B, Lundstrom R, Ramser K. From Biomedical Research to Spin-Off Companies for the Health Care Market. MEDICON 2010; 26: 624- 626. [ DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-13039-7_157] 11. Hajiketabi A, Zolfaghari A, Goodarzi K, Akhondi AR. [Environmental factors and medical spin-offs: a case study]. Peace Journal 2017; 16 (5): 647-658.[Persian] 12. Zolfaghari A, Hejazi SR. Explaining Conceptual Model of Growth of Productive Companies of Jahad University. Economics and Business Research Journal 2013; 4 (5): 51- 33. [Persian] 13. Helm R, Mauroner O. Success of research-based spin-offs. State- of- the- art and guidelines for further research. RMS 2007; 1(3): 237- 270. [ DOI:10.1007/s11846-007-0010-x] 14. Bieschke KJ. Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: implications for developing scientifically minded pcychology. Journal of career assessment 2006; 14 (1): 77- 91. [ DOI:10.1177/1069072705281366] 15. Jahed HA, Arasteh HR, Jaafari P, [Explaining of Individual Factors Influencing Commercialization of Research Results; The Case of Islamic Azad University of Science and Research Branch]. Journal of Science and Technology Policy 2011; 4 (1):1- 16. [Persian] 16. Borges C, Filio LJ. Spin-off Process and the Development of Academic Entrepreneur's Social Capital. J. Technol. Manag. Innov 2013; 8 (1): 21- 34. [ DOI:10.4067/S0718-27242013000100003] 17. Levie J. The university is the classroom: teaching and learning technology commercialization at a technological university. J Technol Transf 2014; 39(5): 793- 808. [ DOI:10.1007/s10961-014-9342-2] 18. Nelson AJ, Monsen E. Teaching technology commercialization: introduction to the special section. J Technol Transf 2014; 39(5): 774- 779. [ DOI:10.1007/s10961-014-9341-3] 19. Rasmussen E, Borch OJ. [University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin- off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy 2010; 39(5): 602- 612. [ DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002] 20. Jalili N, Mousakhani M, Behboudi M. Nationalized Model for Commercialization", Field Study in Iran. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business 2011; 1 (4): 118- 129. 21. Umum KK, Umam KK, Hewanto WD, Larso D. Higher education institution and technology transfer. proceedings of the 5th AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange; 2008 Feb; Australia.Melbourne: 2008. 22. O'Shea RP, Chugh H, Allen TJ. Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. J Technol Transfer 2008;33(6): 655- 666. [ DOI:10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0] 23. Kang SW. An Identification of Unsuccessful, Failure Factors of Technology Innovation and Development in SMEs: A Case Study of Components and Material Industry. International Journal of Business and Management 2012; 7 (19): 16- 30. [ DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v7n19p16] 24. Kimura O. Public R&D and commercialization of energy- efficient technology: A Case study of Japanese projects. Energy Policy 2010; 38(11): 7358- 7369. [ DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.012] 25. Amadi-Echendu JE, Rasetlola RT. Technology Commercialization Factors, Frameworks and Models. lst Technology Management Conference 2011 Jun 27; USA. San Jose, CA; 2011. [ DOI:10.1109/ITMC.2011.5995939] 26. Sakhdari J. [Academic Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Workshop. Research Deputy of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. 2013; [Available from: http://library.um.ac.ir/index.php?option=com_weblinks&view=category&id=128&wlang=0&itemid=587&lang=fa. [Persian] 27. Regan P. The Relationships between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organization Structure and Ownership in the European Airport Industry [dissertation]. Dublin: Department of Management Smurfit Graduate School of business, University College Dublin, lack rock;2006 28. Mustar P, Wright M. Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer 2010; 35(1): 42- 65. [ DOI:10.1007/s10961-009-9113-7] 29. Jensen PH, Webster E. Macroeconomic conditions and the determinants of commercialization. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2011; 35: 125- 143. [ DOI:10.1093/cje/beq012] 30. Esmaeili M, Yamani Doozi Sorkhabi M, Haji Hosseini H, Kiamanesh A. [A Survey on Relationship between Engineering Colleges of Tehran's Public Universities and Industry, within the Framework of National Innovation System]. IRPHE. 2011; 17 (1) :27-46. [Persian] 31. Yadollahi Farsi J, Amini Z. [Identifying the institutional and environmental factors affecting the transfer of technology in the field of biotechnology].Technology growth 2011;7(28):27-33. [Persian] 32. Pourabasi R, Rudgarnejad F, Kieakajuri K. [The commercialization strategy of university research in Islamic Azad University faculties of Rasht: Measurement of effective factors]. 2nd International Technology Commerce Conference; 2015 Feb 22-23; Tehran: civilica; 2014. [Persian] 33. Van Geenhuizen M, Nijkamp P. Creative Knowledge Cities: Myths, Visions and Realities. New Horizons in Regional Science Series.1st ed. Cheltenham, UK;Edward Elgar Pub; 2012. [ DOI:10.4337/9780857932853] 34. Erdos K, Varga A. The academic entrepreneur: myth or reality for increased regional growth in Europe. in Van Geenhuizen M, Nijkamp P. Creative Knowledge Cities. 1st ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012. 35. Bertacchini EE, Bravo G, Marrelli M, Santagata W. Cultural Commons: A New Perspective on the Production and Evolution of Cultures. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012. [ DOI:10.4337/9781781000069] 36. Aghajani HA, Hosseini A, Sarvari Ashliki Z. [Identifying and Prioritizing the Factors Influencing the Commercialization of Products by Knowledge Based Companies with the Technique of FAHP , Experimental Examination: Knowledge Based Companies Based in the Growth Centers of Northern Regions of Iran]. Journal of Operational Research in its Applications 2015; 12 (3): 85- 100. [Persian] 37. Cho J, Lee J. Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications 2013; 40(13): 5314- 5330. [ DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038] 38. Aarikka-Stenroos L, Lehtimaki T. Commercializing a Radical Innovation: Probing the Way to the Market. Industrial Marketing Management 2014; 43(8): 1372-1384. [ DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.08.004] 39. Sternberg R.Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation 2014; 34(3): 137- 148. [ DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.11.003] 40. Fini R, Fu K, Rasmussen E, Wright M. Institutional determinants of university spin- off quantity and quality: A longitudinal, multi-level, cross-country study. Small Bus Econ 2017; 48 (2): 361- 391. [ DOI:10.1007/s11187-016-9779-9] 41. Feldman KS. The commercialization of public higher education: Balancing academic, fiscal and market values. The University of New Mexico; 2007. 42. Hashemnia SH, Emadzadeh M, Samadi S, Saketi P. [Effective Factors on Earmarked Revenues of Researches in Iranian Universities of Technology]. Higher education 2009; 15(2): 22- 31. [Persian] 43. Rasmussen E, Mosey S, Wright M. The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy 2014; 43(1):92- 106. [ DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007] 44. Visintin F, Pittino D. Founding team composition and early performance of University-Based spin-off companies. Technovation 2014;34(1): 31–43. [ DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.004] 45. Chandra A, Silva M. Business Incubation in Chile: Development, Financing and Financial Services. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 2012; 7 (2): 1- 13. [ DOI:10.4067/S0718-27242012000200001] 46. Uzunca B. Comparative Advantages of Spinoff Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 2011; 6 (4): 80- 92. [ DOI:10.4067/S0718-27242011000400007] 47. Muller K. Academic spin-off's transfer speed-Analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Research Policy 2010; 39(2): 189- 199. [ DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.001] 48. Walter A, Auer M, Ritter T. The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing 2006; 21(4): 541- 567. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005] 49. Gubeli MH, Doloreux D. An empirical study of university spin-off development. European Journal of Innovation Management 2005; 8 (3): 269- 282. [ DOI:10.1108/14601060510610153] 50. Lockett A, Wright M, Franklin S. Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategie. Small Business Economics 2003; 20(2):185- 200. [ DOI:10.1023/A:1022220216972] |
