Volume 12, Issue 2 (2020)                   Res Med Edu 2020, 12(2): 31-38 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bashardoust N, Ghadiri D, Haghani S, Bagheri S, Mirfarhadi N. Effective criterion on theoretical and practical Teaching from Guilan Dental Students’ Viewpoint. Res Med Edu 2020; 12 (2) :31-38
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-900-en.html
PhD Candidate in Nursing, Medical Education Research Center, Education Development Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , mirfarhadin@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3586 Views)
Introduction: University is one of the most important and productive organs. Thus, teachers with desirable characteristics are necessary to achieve goals of education and nurture. Recognizing teaching criterion  from students’ viewpoint would improve education. In this regards this study  has been done to survey Rasht’s dentistry students’ viewpoints about the effective criterion on theoretical and practical teaching in 2017.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study 230 students of Rasht dentistry school that were selected through census method, participated. Data were collected by a researcher-made questionnaire including two parts that validity and reliability was confirmed. The first part of questionnaire  consist of demographic characteristics and the Second part was about theoretical and practical teaching criteria (16 questions). Data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics, variance analysis test, Turkey test, Independent T test, two-tail significant, and one-way ANOVA through SPSS.
Results: Of 230 participants with mean age of 21.35, 116 were female (50.4%) and 114 were male (49.6%).The most important characteristics  in the field of theoretical teaching  were mastery of teaching subject (70.4%) clear and certain speech (53.9%) making realtion between theoretical and practical subjects (53.5%).The least important characteristics in this field were giving pamphlet and booklet of materials taught (20%), interesting in research and study (17%).In practical teaching field the least important item was holding scheduled speechs such as journal clubs and case presentation (20%) and  the most important item in this field , being available during  clinic hours (53.5%).There was a relation between year of study and mean of practical score (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on  the results,mastery of teaching subject is the most effective factors in theoretical  field ,also, in addition to teachers scientific skills,being available in clinical field can be effective in promoting practical field.
Full-Text [PDF 552 kb]   (881 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Teaching Method

References
1. Pakkies NE, Mtshali NG. [Students' views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis]. curationis 2016; 39 (1): 1- 8. [DOI:10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1516]
2. Zohoor A, Eslaminejad T. [Teacher's effective teaching criteria as viewed by the students of Kerman University of Medical Sciences]. Journal of medical Education 2004; 4 (2) :60- 65. [Persian]
3. Hekmatpou D, Jahani F, Nejat N. [Exploration of characteristics of a competent nursing faculty member: A qualitative study]. IJNR 2013; 8 (1): 58- 67 [Persian]
4. Asgari F, Mahjoob Moadab H. [Comparing characteristics of an effective teaching from teachers' and students' point of view, Guilan University of Medical Sciences]. Strides in Development of medical education 2010; 7 (1): 26- 33. [Persian]
5. Vahabi S, Ebadi A, Rahmani R, Tavallaei A, Khatouni A, Tadrisi S, et al. [Comparison of the status of clinical education in the views of nursing educators and students]. Education strategies in medical sciences 2011; 3 (4): 179- 82. [Persian]
6. Cheraghi M, Esmaeili M, Ghisvandian S. [Characteristics of an elite instructor: A qualitative study]. The Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty2014; 12(2): 86- 93. [Persian]
7. Hokmabadi R, Fallah H.[ Ideal university teachers according to students'views]. J Med Educ Dev. 2013; 6 (10) : 22- 29 [Persian]
8. Seyyed Majidi M, Seyyed Majidi A, Hbibzadeh Bijani F, Khodadadi E, Motalebnejad M. [Evaluation of an effective teaching's characteristics from Babol dental faculty postgraduate students' viewpoints]. Biannual Journal of Medical Education Education Development Center (edc) Babol University of Medical Sciences 2018; 6 (2): 32- 8. [Persian]
9. Pettit JE, Axelson RD, Ferguson KJ, Rosenbaum ME. [Assessing effective teaching: what medical students value when developing evaluation instruments]. Academic Medicine 2015; 90 (1): 94- 9. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000447]
10. Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. [Factors affecting students' evaluation of teachers: Comparing viewpoints of teachers and students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2010; 10 (2): 186- 95. [Persian]
11. Tahmasebzadeh sheikhlar D, Fathiazar S, Jafarian V, Hamrahzadeh M, Zilabi G. [Criteria of Effective Teaching and Its Application in the Educational Process: Views of Faculty members and Students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2018; 18: 257- 68. [Persian]
12. Yazdankha Fard M, Pouladi S, Kamali F, Zahmatkeshan N, Mirzaie K, Akaberian S, et al. [The Stressing Factors in Clinical Education: The Viewpoints of Students]. Iranian journal of medical education 2008; 8 (2): 341- 350. [Persian]
13. Obeidi N. [Effective factors on the communication between students and faculty members in the viewpoint of paramedical students]. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2010; 3 (3): 133- 136. [Persian]
14. Martens MJ, Duvivier RJ, Van Dalen J, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJ, Van Der Vleuten CP. [Student views on the effective teaching of physical examination skills: a qualitative study]. Medical Education 2009; 43(2): 184- 91. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03283.x]
15. Singh S, Pai DR, Sinha NK, Kaur A, Soe HHK, Barua A. [Qualities of an effective teacher: what do medical teachers think?]. BMC Medical Education 2013; 13 (1): 128. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-13-128]
16. Samaga M, Hemalatha N. [A good teacher e medical stu-dents' views]. IOSR J Pharm 2014; 4 (9): 01e5. [DOI:10.9790/3013-04090105]
17. Akbari M, Moeintaghavi A, Ghanbari H, Bageri M, Otoufi A. [A Comparison of the Students' and Teachers' Viewpoints about the Characteristics of a Good Teacher in Dentistry]. Journal of Mashhad Dental School 2014; 38 (4): 281- 90. [Persian]
18. Koura AA, Al-Hebaishi SM. [The Relationship between multiple intelligences, self-efficacy and academic achievement of Saudi gifted and regular intermediate students]. Educational Research International 2014; 3 (1): 48- 70.
19. Eslamian H, Eslamian Z, Karami M. [Study the relationship of applying the criteria for effective teaching by faculty with students morale Bitch]. Curriculum Planning Knowledge & Research in Educational Sciences 2018; 15 (29): 132- 147 [Persian]
20. Aghamirzayi T, Salehi Omran E, Rahimpour Kami B. [Effective Factors on Student Evaluation of Faculty Members Performance]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2014; 7 (1): 57- 62. [Persian]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Medical Education

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb