[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 3 (2019) ::
RME 2019, 11(3): 22-29 Back to browse issues page
The effect of Team Based Learning and Classical Lecture on the Knowledge and Attitudes of Midwifery Students in the Course of Midwifery Emergency
S Mollashaei Share , HR Baradaran , T Boryri , A Teimouri * , Sh Mollashaei Share , AR Mollashaei Share
Children & Adolescent Health Research Center, Resistant Tuberculosis Institute, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan , alirezateimouri260@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3813 Views)
Introduction: Team-based learning (TBL) is a new teaching strategy in participatory and active learning that uses  in individual  or groups of students in problem-solving method. This study aimed to compare the effect of two methods of teaching classical lecture and TBL method on midwifery students´ knowledge and attitude in midwifery emergencies course.
Method: In this clinical trial, post-test evaluation was conducted on 30 undergraduate midwifery students of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. The students were divided into two groups according to grade point average and then were randomly assigned to the groups of  teaching,  classical lecture (15 students) and the other group teaching to TBL (15 students). Educational intervention for each group was done separately for 2 hours in 5 sessions. The effect of methods assessed on the attitude by a 20-item questionnaire and on the knowledge by the final exam which was completed in 5 sessions in both methods. Data were analyzed using independent t-test  by SPSS.
Results: Results showed a significant difference between the mean scores of knowledge in lecture group (16/95) and TBL group (22.53) (t = 6.07, P <0.001). Same trends occurred between the mean scores of individual assessment in TBL group (23.60) and group evaluation (25.80) (t = 7.35, P <0.001). There was a significant difference between the mean scores of students' attitudes in lecture group (34.53) and TBL group (78) in favor of TBL (P <0.001, t = 15.749).
Conclusion: Based on findings, TBL enhanced the knowledge and the positive attitude of the students.  Therefore, teachers should be encouraged to use this method especially for the midwifery student for particular lessons.
Full-Text [PDF 622 kb]   (1135 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Hassanzadeh G, Abolhasani F, Mirzazadeh A, Alizadeh M. [Team-Based Learning A New Strategy in Integrated Medical Curriculum: The experience of School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2013; 13 (7): 601-610. [persian]
2. Jafari E, Fathi Vajargah K, Arefi M, RezaeizadehM [.Identification of strengths, defects, opportunities and threats in MOOC-based curricula in Iran's higher education system]. Technology of Education 2018; 13(2): 269-281. [persian]
3. Vaezi A, Azizian F, Kopayehzadeh J.[Survey compare team based learning and lecture teaching method, on learning-teaching process nursing student's, in Surgical and Internal Diseases course]. jmed 2015; 10 (3): 246-254. [persian]
4. Hadges B, Videto D. Assessment & planning health programs..1st ed. Sudbury, MA : Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2005.
5. Wood DF. Teaching and learning in a large group. Diabet Med 2003; 20 (Suppl 3): 2-4. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.000987_2x]
6. Momeni H, Salehi A, Sadeghi H. Comparing the Effect of Problem Based Learning and Concept Mapping on Critical Thinking Disposition of Nursing Student. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2017;10(4):234-44.
7. Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK. Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15(6): 366-71. [DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06439.x]
8. Sand-Jecklin K. The impact of active/cooperative instruction on beginning nursing student learning strategy preference. Nurse Education Today 2007 ;27(5):474-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.006]
9. Johnson DW, Johnson Roger T, Stanne MB. Cooperative Learning Methods: a Meta-Analysis. [cited 2006 Aug 12]. Available from: http:// www.co-operation.org/ pages/ cl-methods. html.
10. Safari M, Yazdan panah B, Ghafarian H, Yazdan panah SH. Comparing the effect of lecture and group discussion on student learning and satisfaction Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2006; 6(1): 59-64. [Persian]
11. Michaelsen LK, Sweet M. Team-Based Learning. National Education Association. [cited 2008 Agu 23]. Available from: http:// www.nea.org/ home/ 34362. htm [: 23- August-2016]
12. Lee M. Creating knowledge through partnerships in global education using small group strategies with large groups .J of Nurse Education 2001; 40 (5): 222-4.
13. Jafari Z, Miri K, Malekzade J, Davoudi N, Mazloum S, Omid A, et al.[Comparison of Rehabilitation Students' Learning in Neurology through Lecture with Team-Based Learning (TBL)]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2013; 13 (6): 448-456. [Persian]
14. Vasan NS, DeFouw D. Team learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Med Educ 2005; 39 (5): 524. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02146.x]
15. Rastegar T, Hoshyari Manesh S, Salari H.[Effect of Team based learning on rehabilitation students anatomy learning]. sjimu 2016; 23 (6) :163-168. [Persian]
16. Sabouri Shahrbabak S, Dehghani M. Comparison of Team-Based Learning and Lecturing Methods in Pharmacological Biotechnology for Pharmacology Students, sdmej2017; 14(2): e64093. [DOI:10.5812/sdme.64093]
17. Zgheib NK, Simaan JA, Sabra R. Using team-based learning to teach clinical pharmacology in medical school: student satisfaction and improved performance. J Clin Pharm 2011; 51(7): 1101-11. [DOI:10.1177/0091270010375428]
18. Hubert Wiener H, Plass RM. Herbert HW, Richard Marz P. Team-based Learning in Intensive Course Format for First-year Medical Students. Croat Med J 2009; 50 (1): 69-76. [DOI:10.3325/cmj.2009.50.69]
19. Kuhne-Eversmann L, Eversmann T, Fischer MR. Team- and case-based learning to activate participants and enhance knowledge: an evaluation of seminars in Germany. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008; 28 (3): 165-71. [DOI:10.1002/chp.175]
20. Zeheib NK, Simaan JA, Sabra R. Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance. Med Teacher. Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning. Teach Learn Med 2004, 16 (3): 270-5.
21. Zingone MM, Franks AS, GuirguisAB, GeorgeCM, Howard-Thompson A, Heidel RE. Comparing Team-Based and Mixed Active-Learning Methods in an Ambulatory Care Elective Course. Am J Pharmaceutical Edu 2010; 74 (9): 1-7. [DOI:10.5688/aj7409160]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mollashaei Share S, Baradaran H, Boryri T, Teimouri A, Mollashaei Share S, Mollashaei Share A. The effect of Team Based Learning and Classical Lecture on the Knowledge and Attitudes of Midwifery Students in the Course of Midwifery Emergency. RME 2019; 11 (3) :22-29
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-807-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 3 (2019) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education