Volume 17, Issue 1 (2025)                   Res Med Edu 2025, 17(1): 1-6 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Dehnadi Moghadam A. Measuring Faculty Excellence: Introducing a Model. Res Med Edu 2025; 17 (1) :1-6
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1498-en.html
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rsht, Iran & Road Trauma Research Center, Trauma Institute, Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , dehnadianoush@gmail.com
Abstract:   (839 Views)
Dear Editor
Academic development has been a major topic of discussion in higher education in the United States since the 1960s (1). According to a comprehensive study of 190 higher education institutions from 1965 to 1985, faculty evaluation of faculty was considered one of the most common vitality strategies (2). The most frequent finding of this study was that faculty vitality programs followed by effective connection and continuity of faculty development with the mission and policies of the institution as a key issue. The role of faculty competence and the quality of teaching in training effective graduates is well-known.
The European Union high level group on modernization of higher education  has identified the Assessment of teaching competence as a foundation for appointment and progression (3). Assessing the performance and excellence of faculty members, who are the core of university human resources, is a challenging issue. There are various criteria for this evaluation, which generally focus more on research performance, while the main objective of hiring faculty members has been the development of education. The common structure of academic scoring,  rewarding  research  More than teaching (4).
The question now arises: "Can faculty members' research be related to student learning and improving the quality of education?" For example, would the teaching effectiveness of a faculty member with 20 articles be twice as effective as that of another with 10 articles? Different variables affect this issue, for example learner surveys (older studies) (5), learning outcomes (newer studies) (6), the type and number of universities studied (research-oriented or teaching-oriented), the presence of top researchers, other capabilities of the faculty member, and the existence of standardized data for learning outcomes at different levels of higher education. In summary, if education in research-based universities lacks the necessary status and credibility, the relationship between research output and education quality will not be positive. Moreover, the cultural climate of the university affects the excellence of education.
Medical education has undergone significant changes in recent years owing to advances in medical knowledge, changes in healthcare delivery systems, patients' needs and expectations, and the emergence of new learning technologies, which have consequently transformed the role of medical educators (7). Therefore, a scientific approach is needed to evaluate educational performance, as outlined by Harden (8). Education, or the art of teaching, is a complex combination of knowledge and art that must be purposefully defined in terms of its acquisition and criteria for excellence (9).
According to the model presented by Harden, educational excellence is equal to the product of three components: 1) technical skills, 2) approach to teaching , and 3) professional competence.
Excellence Score = Technical Skills × approach to teaching × Professional Competence
The multiplication method was chosen because the presence of competence in all three areas is mandatory, meaning that the absence of competence in one area makes the result equale to  zero. Technical skills include information provider, role model facilitator, evaluating, curriculum planning , educational resource developer; approach to teaching  includes following scientific principles, professional attitude and ethics, decision-making, and teamwork; professional competence (personal development) consists of skill development and scientific promotion, professionalism, self-audit, portfolio, commitment, and research (Figure 1).

To score these criteria, a methodology is needed that clearly and quantifiably specifies the details of each component and the scoring (10, 11).
For example, the score for each variable or educational activity can be calculated as follows:
Score for each educational activity (G) = Number of activities completed in a semester (n) × Calculated quality factor of the educational activity (q)

Finally, it should be noted that the professors' approach to education and their associated responsibilities should not be considered a daily task, but rather, on the path to a higher rank, the passion for education is also internalized, and the belief in its positive impact on students and its social benefits
becomes evident. Of course, achieving excellence in education, which has various dimensions, requires teamwork and convergence to accurately determine it and is closely related to university policies and strategies and allocated resources (12). The fundamental changes in medical education in recent years and the existence of a clear roadmap in the world's top universities necessitate a rapid review of the mission of the country's universities. This review should be carried out with a comprehensive view of academic resources and products, including skilled personnel and scientific products in conjunction with the industry, in order to provide the necessary conditions for the continued dynamism and survival of universities in the era of digital technologies.

 
Full-Text [PDF 1156 kb]   (371 Downloads)    
Type of Study: letter to Editor | Subject: assessment and evaluation

References
1. Sell GR. Enhancing Faculty Careers: Strategies for Development and Renewal. J Higher Educ 1991:62(4):477-481. [DOI:10.1080/00221546.1991.11774147]
2. Bland C. Schmitz CC. Faculty Vitality on Review: Retrospect and Prospect. J Higher Educ,1988;59(2):190-224. [DOI:10.1080/00221546.1988.11778321]
3. European Commission, Report on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe's higher education institutions. High level group on the modernization of higher education; 2013. [Link]
4. Leslie DW. Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe's core value. J Higher Educ. 2002;73 (1):49-73. [DOI:10.1353/jhe.2002.0008]
5. Marsh HW, Hattie J. The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness: Complementary, Antagonistic, or Independent Constructs? J Higher Educ 2002;73(5):603-641. [DOI:10.1080/00221546.2002.11777170]
6. Galbraith CS Merrill GB. Faculty Research Productivity and Standardized Student Learning Outcomes in a University Teaching Environment: A Bayesian Analysis of Relationships, Studies Higher Educ 2011; 37(4): 469-480. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2010.523782]
7. Stillman, J. Teacher Learning in an Era of High-Stakes Accountability: Productive Tension and Critical Professional Practice. Teach College Rec 2011;113(1):133-180. [DOI:10.1177/016146811111300107]
8. Harden RM, Lilley P. The eight roles of the medical teacher: the purpose and functions of a teacher in the healthcare professions. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier;2018. [Link]
9. Skelton A. Understanding Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Towards a Critical Approach. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 2005. [DOI:10.4324/9780203412947]
10. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential Skills for a Medical Teacher. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2017. [Link]
11. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. Essential Skills for a Medical Teacher. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier;2021. [Link]
12. Elton L. Dimensions of excellence in university teaching. Int J Acade Develop 1998;3(1): 3-11. [DOI:10.1080/1360144980030102]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Medical Education

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb