|
1. Rajaee A.[Pathology of higher education policy making in Iran]. ihej 2023; 14 (3): 20-30. [Persian] 2. Khosravi M, Hassani M, Mohajeran B.[Identifying the components of the model of recruitment and effectiveness of higher education management graduates in the governance system of higher education in Iran]. Higher Education Letter 2022; 15(58): 127-60. [Persian] 3. Rahmanpour M, Hosseini M, Nasr A. [Satisfaction Rate of Assessment Strategies of Learning Outcomes in the Graduate Curriculum Viewpoint of Professors and Students: A Case Study of University of Isfahan]. AJHEL 2018; 11(43): 25-48. [Persian] 4. Liu S, Liu S. Higher education quality assessment and university change: A theoretical approach. Quality Assurance and Institutional Transformation 2016:15-46. [ DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-0789-7_2] 5. Jalili M, Khabaz Mafinejad M, Gandomkar R, Mortaz Hejri S. [Principles and methods of student assessment in health professions].Tehran: Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences; 2017 [Persian] 6. Pereira D, Flores MA, Niklasson L. Education EiH. Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2016; 41(7): 1008-32. [ DOI:10.1080/02602938.2015.1055233] 7. Borzou SR, Oshvandi K, Cheraghi F, Moayed MS. [Comparative study of nursing PhD education system and curriculum in Iran and John Hopkins school of nursing]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2016; 9(3): 194-205. [Persian] 8. UNC School of Education. Ph.D in Education Handbook January 2023. [Cited 2023 Nov 12]. Available from: https://ed.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/SOE-Doctoral-Handbook-FINAL-January-2023-1.pdf 9. Old Dominion University. Student Guide: The Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination. [Cited 2023 Nov 12]. Available from: https://ww1.odu.edu/intlstudies/gpis/resources/student-guide-phd-comprehensive-examination. 10. Wood P. Contemplating the value of comprehensive exams: Do they have a role in a radical agenda for reimagining the PhD in the neoliberal university?. Geojournal 2015; 80(20): 225-9. [ DOI:10.1007/s10708-014-9582-6] 11. Camacho A. A Comprehensive Exam as an Improvement Tool to Increase the Board of Registry Exam Application and Performance 2018; 150: S84. [ DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqy095.203] 12. McGee RW. Let's Eliminate Comprehensive Exams: An Application of Economic and Ethical Theory to a Practical Issue. [Cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=242344 13. Lindquist JL, Wortman SE, Francis C. Adding value to graduate education: the comprehensive examination. NACTA Journal 2011:105-107. 14. Farokhi F, Golmakani N, Tafazoli M.[Attitude of Undergraduate Midwifery Students about Final Comprehensive Exam in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2011; 10 (4) :410-416 [Persian] 15. Memarian B, Gollish S, Moozeh K, Gerrard D, Tihanyi D, Costa SA, editors. [Comprehensive exam variations and experiences of doctoral candidates in engineering]. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2019 Jun 15; 2019. [Persian] 16. Allard E, Leclerc-Loiselle J, Lavallée A, Vinette B, Larue CJNEiP. PhD nursing students' changing needs relative to the comprehensive doctoral examination 2021;50:102917. [ DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102917] 17. Asghari F, Nemati MAJJoICR. [The challenge of the quality of PhD thesis in Iran (based on the concept of value Chain)]. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research 2016; 9(2): 159-91.[Persian] 18. Abdi Shahshahani M, Ehsanpour S, Yamani N, Kohan S, Dehghani ZJIJoME. The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Reproductive Health PhD Program in Iran Based on CIPP Evaluation Model. IJME 2014; 14 (3):252-64. [Persian] 19. Graneheim UH, Lindgren BM, Lundman B. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper 2017; 56: 29-34. [ DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002] 20. Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
|
