[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 4 (2023) ::
RME 2023, 15(4): 32-41 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scenario-Based Training through Face-To-Face and Blended Methods on learning of Operating Room Students
MA Montaseri , Z Badiyepeymaiejahromi , Z Shadfard , Z Pishgar , M Taghizadeganzadeh *
Department of Operating Room, Paramedical school, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran , mahboob.6691@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (196 Views)
Introduction: one of the biggest challenges in the training of operating room students is to provide an effective teaching method in the course of familiarizing with the operating room equipment and using these tools in the clinical setting. Therefore, this research was conducted with the aim of comparing the effect of scenario-based training through face-to-face and blended methods on the learning rate of this lesson.
Method: This is a quasi-experimental study that was conducted in the form of a pre-test and post-test on 40 operating room students of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences that were selected by census method in 2021-22. Then the scores obtained from the tests were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and analytical (paired and independent t-test through SPSS.
Results: The results indicated that the mean score of the test after training with the face-to-face method was 13.47±3.03 and the mean score of the test after training with the blended method was 15.82±1.91. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of pre and post-test in the blended method group (P<0.05) and between the post-tests of both groups (p=0.009).
Conclusion: The findings indicated that the use of the blended method has increased the students' mean scores and learning level. Therefore, considering the effectiveness of this training method, it is suggested that other instructors also use this training method to increase the students' learning.
Keywords: Training, Scenario, Blended, Face-To-Face, Student
Full-Text [PDF 505 kb]   (115 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Teaching Method
References
1. Khoobi M, Mohammadi N, Ahmadi Hedayat M, Ghiyasvandiyan S, Varaei S. [Comparison of the nursing students' learning in two teaching methods using CD and training through traditional method]. J Nurs Educ 2017;5(6):18-23. [Persian] [DOI:10.21859/jne-05063]
2. Safari M, Ghahari L. [Comparing the Effects of Lecture and Work in Small Groups on Learning of Head and Neck Osteology in Medical Students]. Iranian journal of medical education 2011;11(1):10-5. [Persian]
3. Abbas Zadeh A, Sabeghi H, Heydari A, Borhani F. [Assessment of the effect of continuing education program on nurse's knowledge, attitude and performance about documentation]. Evidence Based Care 2012;2(1):75-83. [Persian]
4. Amiri F, Pishgooie SAH, Aliyari S, Habibi H. [A Comparative Study on the Effect of Game and Speech Training on Nurses' Learning and Reminder of Emergency Trailer Drugs in Selected Military Hospitals]. Military Caring Sciences Journal 2019;6(1):9-15. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/mcs.6.1.9]
5. Errington E. As close as it gets: Developing professional identity through the potential of scenario-based learning [Cited 2023 Nov 5]. Available from: https://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/15344/1/CHAPTER%2BC3.pdf
6. Ahmed HH. Adopting scenario based learning in critical care nursing education: students' achievement and feedback. Am J Nurs 2019;7(4):581-8. [DOI:10.12691/ajnr-7-4-20]
7. Bagheri M, Mohammadi Polarti A, Karimi S. [Investigating the effect of reflective learning based on clinical scenarios on the moral sensitivity of nursing students]. Journal of Education and Ethics in Nursing 2022;11 (1-2):39-46. [Persian]
8. Battista A. An activity theory perspective of how scenario-based simulations support learning: a descriptive analysis. Advances in Simulation 2017;2(1):1-14. [DOI:10.1186/s41077-017-0055-0]
9. Baek KH, Cho JH, Park J. Effects of developing scenario learning in a fundamental nursing course: a pilot study. BMC Medical Education 2022;22(1):402. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03462-z]
10. Izadi F, Bijani M, Fereidouni Z, Karimi S, Tehranineshat B, Dehghan A. The effectiveness of teaching nursing ethics via scenarios and group discussion in nurses' adherence to ethical codes and patients' satisfaction with nurses' performance. The Scientific World Journal. 2020;2020:1-7. [DOI:10.1155/2020/5749687]
11. Du YL, Ma CH, Liao YF, Wang L, Zhang Y, Niu G. Is clinical scenario simulation teaching effective in cultivating the competency of nursing students to recognize and assess the risk of pressure ulcers? Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2021;14:2887-96. [DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S315138]
12. Hsu LL, Huang YH, Hsieh SI. The effects of scenario-based communication training on nurses' communication competence and self-efficacy and myocardial infarction knowledge. Patient education and counseling 2014;95(3):356-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.03.010]
13. Mahran G, Mahgoub AA, Abass MS. The effect of scenario based teaching for critical care nurses and physicians on their knowledge of fluid creep. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2019;9(4):86-97. [DOI:10.5430/jnep.v9n4p86]
14. Schober P, Kistemaker KR, Sijani F, Schwarte LA, van Groeningen D, Krage R. Effects of post-scenario debriefing versus stop-and-go debriefing in medical simulation training on skill acquisition and learning experience: a randomized controlled trial. BMC medical education 2019;19(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1772-y]
15. Parvaresh Masoud M, Farhadloo R, Vahedian M, Kashaninejad M, Hasanpoor L, S. M. [A comparison between the effects of scenario and lecture-based education methods on knowledge and attitude of emergency medical technicians towards patients with chest trauma]. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2016;10(5):47-54. [Persian]
16. Rahmani A, Mohammadi A, Moradi Y. Effectiveness of scenario-based education on the performance of the nurses in the critical cardiac care unit for patients with acute coronary syndrome. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences 2016;5(8):218-24.
17. Sadeghi M, Nematollahi M, Farokhzadian J, Khoshnood Z, Eghbalian M. The effect of scenario-based training on the Core competencies of nursing students .Research Square 2023:1-18. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01442-2]
18. Zanjani N, Mirmoghtadaie Z, Taherian M. Effect of E-Scenario-Based Flipped Classroom on Students' Satisfaction in Medical Education. Journal of Medical Education 2022;21(1): e119190. [DOI:10.5812/jme-119190]
19. Najafi H. [The relationship between the dimensions of blended learning and learning quality: A case of PNU]. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences 2017;7 (28):59-80. [Persian]
20. Shorey S, Kowitlawakul Y, Devi MK, Chen H-C, Soong SKA, Ang E. Blended learning pedagogy designed for communication module among undergraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today 2018;61(1):120-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.011]
21. Swaminathan N, Ravichandran L, Ramachandran S, Milanese S. Blended learning and health professional education: Protocol for a mixed-method systematic review. Journal of education and health promotion 2020;9(46):489-19.
22. Han F, Ellis RA. Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education 2019;40:12-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002]
23. Li C, He J, Yuan C, Chen B, Sun Z. The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today 2019;82(1): 51-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004]
24. Chmiel AS, Shaha M, Schneider DK. Introduction of blended learning in a master program: Developing an integrative mixed method evaluation framework. Nurse education today 2017;48(1):172-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.008]
25. Vanslambrouck S, Zhu C, Lombaerts K, Philipsen B, Tondeur J. Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education 2018;36(1):33-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.002]
26. Khalil MK, Abdel Meguid EM, Elkhider IA. Teaching of anatomical sciences: A blended learning approach. Clinical Anatomy 2018;31(3):323-9. [DOI:10.1002/ca.23052]
27. Abualadas HM, Xu L. Achievement of learning outcomes in non‐traditional (online) versus traditional (face‐to‐face) anatomy teaching in medical schools: A mixed method systematic review. Clinical Anatomy 2023;36(1):50-76. [DOI:10.1002/ca.23942]
28. Ali A, Khan RMI, Alouraini A. A Comparative Study on the Impact of Online and Blended Learning. SAGE Open 2023;13(1): 21582440231154417. [DOI:10.1177/21582440231154417]
29. Atwa H, Shehata MH, Al-Ansari A, Kumar A, Jaradat A, Ahmed J, et al. Online, Face-to-face, or blended learning? Faculty and medical students' perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-method study. Frontiers in Medicine 2022; 9: 791352. [DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.791352]
30. Berga KA, Vadnais E, Nelson J, Johnston S, Buro K, Hu R, et al. Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today 2021;96:104622. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622]
31. Chong KM, Yang H-W, He H-C, Lien W-C, Yang M-F, Chi C-Y, et al. The effectiveness of online-only blended cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: static-group comparison study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023; 25: e42325. [DOI:10.2196/42325]
32. Maloney S, Nicklen P, Rivers G, Foo J, Ooi YY, Reeves S, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of blended versus face-to-face delivery of evidence-based medicine to medical students. Journal of medical Internet research. 2015;17(7):e4346. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.4346]
33. Ziabari SMZ, Reihanian Z, Faghani M, Roodsari NN, Kheyrjouei A, Khomeiran RT, et al. Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the theoretical course of ECG in medical students of emergency department. Journal of Current Oncology and Medical Sciences 2023;3(1):388-97.
34. Jafari M. [Comparison of lecture and blended teaching methods on learning and satisfaction of medical students in biochemistry course]. Iranian journal of medical education 2012;12(7):488-97. [Persian]
35. Khazaei Jalil S, Zarouj hosseini R, Abasi A.[ Qualification of Clinical Education of operation room in Bachelor degree from the perspective of students and educators in this field at the University of Medical Sciences in Semnan]. Journal of Education and Ethics in Nursing 2014;3(3):39-46. [Persian]
36. Abell CH, Garrett DM, Jones MS. The effects of an educational program on faculty stages of concern regarding the use of interactive video services (IVS) in undergraduate nursing education. Kentucky nurse 2010;58(2):7.
37. Babanazari Z, Mansouri P, Amini M, Zare N, Raiesi H. [Comparison of the effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training through modified team based learning and traditional method on knowledge and skills of nursing students in the College of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz, 2012]. Journal of Nursing Education 2017;6(3):8-16. [Persian] [DOI:10.21859/jne-06032]
38. Nouri Khaneghah Z, Sadadti L, Faryab Asl M, Karami S, Fatollahi S, Hajfiroozabadi M. [Effect of Blended Learning on Educational Outcome of Discontinuous Undergraduate Students of Operating Room]. Research in Medical Education 2022;14(1):24-31. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/rme.14.1.24]
39. Roohi M, Jahanian I, Gholinia H, Abbaszadeh H. [A Comparison of Traditional Learning and Combined Traditional-ELearning (web-based) on Dentistry Students' Learning of Practical Oral Pathology Course]. Journal of Medical Education Development 2016;9(21):47-52. [Persian]
40. Nowroozi HM, Mohsenizadeh SM, JAFARI SH, Ebrahimzadeh S. [The Effect of Teaching Uning a Blend of Collaborative and Mastery of Learning Models, on Learning of Vital Signs: An Experiment onNursing and Operation Room Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2011;11(5):544-53. [Persian]
41. Mahmoodi F, Habibi Ramiani E, Babazadeh R. [Effective Factors on The Acceptance of Mobile Learning Among Students of Tabriz University and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences]. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2017;10(6):438-46. [Persian]
42. Akgündüz D, Akınoğlu O. The Impact of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Academic Success and Motivation of the Students in Science Education. Egitim ve Bilim 2017;42(191):69-90. [DOI:10.15390/EB.2017.6444]
43. Kim SD. Effects of a blended learning program on ethical values in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2014;20(5):567-75. [DOI:10.11111/jkana.2014.20.5.567]
44. Kazemi T, Zare Bidaki M, Gholami Manzari AM, Amirabadizadeh N, Mohammadi Y. [Comparison of the effectiveness of lecture and mixed training methods for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia topic on the academic motivation of medical clerks and interns]. J Med Edu Dev 2021;15(4):260-70.[Persian]
45. Ceylan VK, Kesici AE. Effect of blended learning to academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences 2017;14(1):308-20. [DOI:10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141]
46. Kuo YC, Belland BR, Schroder KE, Walker AE. K-12 teachers' perceptions of and their satisfaction with interaction type in blended learning environments. Distance Education. 2014;35(3): 360-381. [DOI:10.1080/01587919.2015.955265]
47. Gagnon MP, Gagnon J, Desmartis M, Njoya M. The Impact of Blended Teaching on Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Self‐Directed Learning in Nursing Undergraduates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Nursing education perspectives 2013;34(6):377-82. [DOI:10.5480/10-459]
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Montaseri M, Badiyepeymaiejahromi Z, Shadfard Z, Pishgar Z, Taghizadeganzadeh M. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scenario-Based Training through Face-To-Face and Blended Methods on learning of Operating Room Students. RME 2023; 15 (4) :32-41
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1337-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 4 (2023) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education