[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 2 (2023) ::
RME 2023, 15(2): 73-83 Back to browse issues page
Paramedics Students` Satisfaction of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method in Comparison with Electronic- Content and Lecture- based Instructional Approach
E Navipour , M Rabiei , H Yazdimoghaddam *
Iranian Research Center on Healthy Aging, Operating Room Department, Faculty of Paramedices, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran , ha_yazdimoghaddam@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (450 Views)
Introduction: In recent decades, necessity of revising traditional teaching methods and using new and active learning and student-centered methods by educational systems have been found, and these methods have been used in various sciences, including medical sciences. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the level of satisfaction of flipped classroom teaching method in comparison with the presentation of electronic-content and the lecture-based instructional methods.
Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted in the second semester of the academic year 2021-2022. The research population consist of students of the operating room and intelligence departments of the Faculty of Paramedicine of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (51 students). The students included 15 students of the 2nd semester of the operating room, 18 students of the 4th semester of the operating room, and 18 students of the 1st semester of the anesthesia major. To achieve the goal of the research, the teaching of three courses "an introduction to internal diseases", "principles of sterilization and disinfection" and "medical terms" were studied. These lessons were presented with the help of flipped classroom teaching methods, teaching through E-content and lectures. At the end of each lesson, a standard questionnaire of students' satisfaction with the teacher's teaching method was completed. Data described by Mean and standard deviation and analyzed by variance analysis test, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test through SPSS.
Results: The findings of the research showed that the highest satisfaction score of students in the course of familiarization with internal diseases using the upside-down classroom method was 34.94 ± 5.42, In the course of “the principles of sterilization” and the course of “medical terminology” both of them with the lecture method, it was 38.20 ± 6.95, 37.88 ± 5.90 respectively. The results of the analysis of variance showed that there was no statistically significant relationship between the average satisfaction score in the lecture method among different courses (p=0.316, F=1.181). Also the results showed that there was no statistically significant relationship between the mean satisfaction score in the virtual method among different subjects (p=0.255, H=2.73). The results showed that there was no statistically significant correlation between the two subjects in the inverted method.
Conclusion: The present study showed that students are satisfied with all three teaching methods provided. The level of students' satisfaction with teaching using the flipped classroom metho and lecture method was higher than the method of presenting virtual content.
Full-Text [PDF 598 kb]   (212 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Educational technology, e-Learning,Virtual Education
References
1. Yazdi Moghaddam H, Ahanchian M R.[Explaining the Performance of Operating Room Technicians: A Qualitative Study]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2016; 26 (136): 121-134. [Persian]
2. Haghani F, Rezaei H, Baeigzade A, Eghbali B. Flipped Classroom: A Pedagogical Method. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2016; 16 :104-119. [Persian]
3. Evseeva A, Solozhenko A. Use of Flipped Classroom Technology in Language Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015; 206:205-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006]
4. He J. Research and practice of flipped classroom teaching mode based on guidance case. Education and Information Technologies 2020; 25 (4):2337-52. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10137-z]
5. Abeysekera L, Dawson P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development 2015; 34(1):1-4. [DOI:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336]
6. He W, Holton A, Farkas G, Warschauer M. The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction 2016;45:61-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001]
7. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education 2018; 18(1):38. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z]
8. Jian Q. Effects of digital flipped classroom teaching method integrated cooperative learning model on learning motivation and outcome. The Electronic Library 2019 ;37(5):842-59. [DOI:10.1108/EL-02-2019-0024]
9. O'Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The internet and higher education 2015; 25: 85-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002]
10. Schmidt SM, Ralph DL. The flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research 2016; 9(1):1-6. [DOI:10.19030/cier.v9i1.9544]
11. Voigt M, Fredriksen H, Rasmussen C. Leveraging the design heuristics of realistic mathematics education and culturally responsive pedagogy to create a richer fipped classroom calculus curriculum. ZDM 2020; 52:1051-62. [DOI:10.1007/s11858-019-01124-x]
12. Mazur AD, Brown B, Jacobsen M. Learning designs using fipped classroom instruction. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 2015; 41(2):1-26. [DOI:10.21432/T2PG7P]
13. Lento C. Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped classroom design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 2016; 8(1):72-87. [DOI:10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005]
14. Overmyer GR. The flipped classroom model for college algebra: Effects on student achievement [dissertation]. Colorado: Colorado State University Fort Collins; 2014.
15. Whillier S, Lystad RP. No differences in grades or level of satisfaction in a flipped classroom for neuroanatomy. J Chiropr Educ 2015; 29(2): 127-33. [DOI:10.7899/JCE-14-28]
16. Sezer B. Faculty of medicine students' attitudes towards electronic learning and their opinion for an example of distance learning application. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 55:932-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.018]
17. Arkorful V, Abaidoo N. The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2015; 12(1): 29-42.
18. Khrulyova A A, Sakhieva RG. Forming of Informational Culture as a Necessary Condition of the Level Raising of Higher Education. Man in India 2017; 97(15): 211-225.
19. Kvon GM, Vaks VB, Masalimova AR, Kryukova NI, Rod YS, Shagieva RV, et al. Risk in Implementing New Electronic Management Systems at Universities. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018; 14(3):891-902. [DOI:10.12973/ejmste/81060]
20. Levina EY, Masalimova AR, Kryukova NI, Grebennikov VV, Marchuk NN, Shirev DA, Renglikh KA, Shagieva RV. Structure and Content of e-Learning Information Environment Based on GeoInformation Technologies. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017; 13(8), 5019- 5031. [DOI:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00974a]
21. Seif A.[Modern educational psychology: psychology of learning and instruction]. 6thed. Tehran: dowran; 2016. [Persian]
22. Cevikbas M, Argün Z. An innovative learning model in digital age: Flipped classroom. Journal of Education and Training Studies 2017; 5(11): 189-200. [DOI:10.11114/jets.v5i11.2322]
23. Engelbrecht J, Llinares S, Borba MC. Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM 2020;52:825-41. [DOI:10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4]
24. Prensky M. Dijital yerliler, dijital göçmenler I. On the horizon, NCB University Press 2001; 9(5).
25. Borim Nejad L, Sajadi Hezaveh M, Khosravi S.[The effect of learning contract on self-directed learning and satisfaction of nursing students in clinical education]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2015; 14 (12): 1084-92. [Persian]
26. Van Alten D. Phielix C. Janssen J. Kester L. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 2019; 28 :100281. [DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003]
27. Kapil S. Flipped Classroom for Finance Students: Participative Learning and Flexible Assessment. Theoretical Economics Letters 2019; 9 (8) :2771. [DOI:10.4236/tel.2019.98174]
28. Tan C, Yue WG, Fu Y. Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in nursing education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Nursing Research 2017; 4(4):192-200. [DOI:10.1016/j.cnre.2017.10.006]
29. Gilboy MB. Heinerichs S. Pazzaglia G. Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2015; 47(1) ; 109-114. [DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008]
30. Aboutaleb E, Motavallian A, Dadgaran I, Manoochehri S.[Design, implementation and evaluation of teaching module of liquid dosage form in a Flipped Classroom for pharmacy students]. Research in Medical Education 2019; 11 (4): 35-44. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/rme.11.4.35]
31. Fakhari E, Seyfi N, Najafi M, Vakili M A.[Process Of The Utilizing Of Flipped Classroom For Knowledge And Satisfaction Improvement Of Dental Students In The Periodontal And Pediatric Preclinical Courses]. Teb va Tazkieh 2017; 26(3): 213-218. [Persian]
32. Taghizadeh S, Haji J. An overview of inverted teaching methods. Journal of Educational Studies. 2021; 10(1): 51-57. [Persian]
33. Khoshnoodi Far M, Mohajerpour R, Rahimi E, Roshani D, Zarezadeh Y.[Comparison between the effects of flipped class and traditional methods of instruction on satisfaction, active participation, and learning level in a continuous medical education course for general practitioners]. Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences 2019; 99: 56-65. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/sjku.24.1.56]
34. Omidkhoda A, Dehdarirad H, Changizi V.[ Planning, Implementation and Evaluation of Active Learning -Teaching Methods in Inverted Classroom, Peer Learning and Virtual Education] among Students in the School of Allied Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2021; 13 (3); 42 -54. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/rme.13.3.42]
35. Mortazavi Moghadam S.GH, Allahyari E, Vahedi F, Zare Bidaki M.[The Effect of Web -based Flipped Classroom Approach on Learning and Satisfaction of Medical Students Comparison with Lecture -based Method]. Journal of Medical Education and Development 2021; 16(3): 207-215. [Persian]
36. Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PD. Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education 2015;14(1):ar5. [DOI:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129]
37. Tune JD, Sturek M, Basile DP. Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal phy-siology. Advances in Physiology Education 2013; 37(4), 316-320. [DOI:10.1152/advan.00091.2013]
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Navipour E, Rabiei M, Yazdimoghaddam H. Paramedics Students` Satisfaction of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method in Comparison with Electronic- Content and Lecture- based Instructional Approach. RME 2023; 15 (2) :73-83
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1260-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 2 (2023) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education