[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 4 (2022) ::
RME 2022, 14(4): 58-65 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Two Methods of Face-To-Face Training and Virtual Training in Learning Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Concepts among Emergency Department Interns
E Jalili , Sh Niazi , E Khanlarzade , R Salimi *
Emergency Department, Besat Hospital, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , rasoulsl@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (893 Views)
Introduction: Virtual education in the field of medicine is not a new topic, but it has received special attention due to the limited attendance of students during the covid-19 pandemic. In the current research, the methods of face-to-face training and offline training (virtual- electronic) in learning the concepts of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation have been carried out among interns in the emergency department of Besat Hospital in Hamadan
Methods: In this interventional study, 60 medical interns from the emergency department of Ba'ath Hospital, Hamadan, were randomly divided into two groups of 30 people in the first 6 months of 2019, one group receiving face-to-face training and the other group receiving non-attendance (virtual) training. were trained. The theoretical and practical skills of both groups were evaluated and measured before and after the training and were compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistical tests.
Results: The average theory score of interns under non-face-to-face training was significantly higher than that of interns under face-to-face training (P=0.013). However, no significant difference was observed in terms of the average OSCE score (P=0.136). The academic level and basic information of the studied interns were the same in both groups, so there was no statistically significant correlation between the students' theory and ASK scores with age, sex, academic average, and months of internship. In terms of students satisfaction, there was no significant difference between the students under face-to-face and non-face-to-face education in terms of satisfaction.
Conclusion: Both face-to-face and non-face-to-face training methods are effective in learning advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation concepts in emergency department interns. The effectiveness of non-attendance training in learning theoretical knowledge is more than practical skills.
 
Keywords: Virtual Training, Face-To-Face Training, Medical Students, Internship, Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Full-Text [PDF 318 kb]   (242 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Educational technology, e-Learning,Virtual Education
References
1. Prince KJAH, Van Mameren H, Hylkema N, Drukker J, Scherpbier AJJA, Van Der Vleuten CPM. Does problems based learning lead todeficiencies in basic science knowledge? An empirical case on anatomy. Medical education 2003; 37(1): 15-21. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01402.x]
2. safavi A.[General aspect of teaching methods and techniques]. 8th ed. Tehran: Moaser publication; 2000.[Persian]
3. Olson MH, Hergenhan BR. [An introduction to theories of learning]. Translation by Saif AA. 8th ed. Tehran: Dena publication; 2000.[Persian]
4. Manavifar L, jamshid J. [Advantages and Disadvantages of Blended Teaching Method of Online and Face to Face for Practical Course of Hematology; the Viewpoints of Laboratory Sciences Students in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2011]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2012: 12(8): 628.
5. Miniwatts Marketing Group. Internet World Stats; 2019. [cited 2019 sep 8]. available from: https://www.internetworldstats.com/middle.htm#ir
6. Mangold K. Educating a new generation: teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students. Nurse educator 2007; 32 (1): 21-3. [DOI:10.1097/00006223-200701000-00007]
7. Cilliers EJ. The challenge of teaching generation Z. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences 2017; 3(1): 188-198. [DOI:10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198]
8. Nourian A, Nourian A, Ebnahmadi A, Akbarzadeh A, Khoshnevisan MH. Comparison of E-learning and Traditional Classroom Instruction ofDental Public Health for Dental Students of Shahid Beheshti Dental School during 2010-2011. J Dent Sch 2012;30(2):174-183.
9. kuhpayehzadeh J, khoshnevisan MH, Beyranland A.[Comparison of the two Virtual and Traditional teaching methods in learning the course of the "Introduction to Dental equipment and their maintenance" for the students of the PhD General dentistry at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences]. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences 2016; 23 (143): 63-70.[Persian]
10. Panjehpour M, Ataee N.[Comparison the effectiveness of problem solving method with lecture-based method in the teaching of metabolic biochemistry]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2012; 11 (9): 1318-25. [Persian]
11. Shourcheh B, Heydari M, Moosivand M, Bashirian S, Farahani F, Masoomi M, et al.[Investigate and Compare the Effect of In-person and Teacher-centered Education with Virtual Education in Learning the History of Islamic Culture and Civilization Course of Hamadan Medical Sciences Students]. Pajouhan Sci J 2020; 18 (2): 97-106. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/psj.18.2.97]
12. Makransky G, Bonde MT, Wulff JSG, Wandall J, Hood M, Creed PA, et al. Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education. BMC medical education 2016; 16(1): 1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-016-0620-6]
13. Sabouri S, Alimardanzadeh M.[Exploring the Possible Effect of Virtual Education and face-to-face education methods on the score of Kerman pharmacy students]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2020; 20 (0): 35-42. [Persian]
14. Farahmand S, Jalili E, Arbab M, Sedaghat M, Shirazi M, Keshmiri F, et al. Distance learning can be as effective as traditional learning for medical students in the initial assessment of trauma patients. Acta Medica Iranica 2016: 600-4.
15. Hashemiparast MS, Sadeghi R, Ghaneapur M, Azam K, Tol A. [Comparing E-learning and Lecture-Based Education in Control of Nosocomial Infections]. Journal of Payavard Salamat 2016; 10(3): 230-8. [Persian]
16. Zeraati M, Zakipour M, Aghabararian N.[Comparison of Lecture and Network-Based Educational Methods on Improving the Academic Performance of Students Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences]. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2015; 8(4): 215-22. [Persian]
17. Hoseini Kasnavieh M, Rezai M, Amanollahi A, Seyedian S. Comparison of in-person and non- attendance of training programs to improve the skills of transmitting bad news by emergency medical students. J Med Educ Dev 2021; 13 (39) :49-55. [DOI:10.29252/edcj.13.39.52]
18. Rastgar Farajzadeh L, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Alirezaei Hoor M, Broumand Esfangareh N. [Comparison of The Effectiveness of Face -to- Face and Virtual Training of Basic Cognitive Skills in Mental Rehabilitation Day Care Centers during Covid-19 Pandemic Time]. Shefaye Khatam 2021; 10 (1): 12-20. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/shefa.10.1.12]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jalili E, Niazi S, khanlarzade E, Salimi R. Comparison of Two Methods of Face-To-Face Training and Virtual Training in Learning Advanced Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Concepts among Emergency Department Interns. RME 2022; 14 (4) :58-65
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1254-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 4 (2022) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education