|
1. Kidd TT. A brief history of e-learning. Online Education and Adults Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices. Hershey. IGI Global; 2009. 2. Hosseini MA, Ghahremani AR, Mohammadi Shahbolaghi SF, Hamadzadeh S, Tamizi Z.[The advantages of Electronic Learning in Nursing Education: A Review study].JNE 2016; 4 (4): 9- 16 .[Persian] 3. Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher 2008; 30 (5): 455-73. [ DOI:10.1080/01421590802108331] 4. Wichadee S. Significant predictors for effectiveness of blended learning in a language course. Jalt Call Journal 2018; 14 (1): 25-42. [ DOI:10.29140/jaltcall.v14n1.222] 5. Fernandes J, Costa R, Peres P. Putting order into our universe: The concept of blended learning- A methodology within the concept-based terminology framework. Educ Sci 2016; 6 (15): 1-13. [ DOI:10.3390/educsci6020015] 6. Güzer B, Caner H. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 2014; 116: 4596-603. [ DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992] 7. Kiviniemi MT. Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC medical education 2014; 14 (1): 1-7. [ DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-14-47] 8. Sung YH, Kwon IG, Ryu E. Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom. Nurse education today. 2008; 28 (8): 943-52. [ DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.007] 9. Olelewe CJ, Agomuo EE. Effects of B-learning and F2F learning environments on students' achievement in QBASIC programming. Computers & Education 2016; 103: 76-86. [ DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.012] 10. Melton B, Graf H, Chopak-Foss J. Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2009; 3 (1): 1-13. [ DOI:10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030126] 11. Ismail AMA. Empowering your students satisfaction with blended learning: A lesson from the Arabian Gulf University distance teaching and training program. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2018; 8 (2): 94- 81. [ DOI:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.2.1019] 12. Bedrule-Grigoruţă MV, Rusu M-L. Considerations about e-learning tools for adult education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 142: 749-54. [ DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.610] 13. Salleh KM, Khalid NH, Sulaiman NL, Mohamad MM, Sern LC. Competency of adult learners in learning: application of the iceberg competency model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015; 204: 326-34. [ DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.160] 14. Dumitru IA. Procesul de invatare la varsta adult. In Palo R, Sava S, Ungureanu D (Eds), Educaia adulilor: baze teoretice I repere practice Iai: Polirom 2007. 15. Merriam SB, Caffarella RS, Baumgartner LM. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide.3rd ed.San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons/ Jossey-Bass;2007. 16. Sajid MR, Laheji AF, Abothenain F, Salam Y, AlJayar D, Obeidat A. Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 281-285. [ DOI:10.5116/ijme.57a7.83d4] 17. Zolfaghari M, Negarandeh R, Ahmadi F. [The Evaluation of a Blended E-learning Program for Nursing and Midwifery Students in Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian journal of Medical Education 2011; (4) 10: 398-409.[Persian] 18. Salari Z, Karami M.[Comparing the effectiveness of e-learning, blended learning and face-to-face lecture in industrial training]. New Educational Approaches 2014; 9(2):27-58.[Persian] 19. Esfijani A.[Investigating the Effects of Blended Instruction on Students' Academic Performance and Satisfaction]. New Educational Approaches 2018; 13 (1): 45-66.[Persian] 20. Esfandiary H, Karami M, Ahanchian MR. [Application and evaluation of the effectiveness of the andragogy null model in managerial training programs]. journal of training and development of human resources 2016; (3) 8: 67- 143.[Persian] 21. Ertuğrul U. harmanlanmiş öğrenme ve çevrİmİçİ öğrenme ortamlarinin akademİk başari ve doyuma etkİsİ. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2007: 9 (2): 1-15. 22. Saritepeci M, Cakir H. The effect of blended learning environments on student motivation and student engagement: A study on social studies course. Egitim ve Bilim 2015; 40 (177):203-216. [ DOI:10.15390/EB.2015.2592] 23. Danchak MM, Huguet M-P. Designing for the changing role of the instructor in blended learning. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 2004; 47 (3): 200-10. [ DOI:10.1109/TPC.2004.833684] 24. Saritepci M, Yildiz H. harmanlanmiş öğrenme ortamlarinin öğrencİlerİn derse katilim ve derse karşi motİvasyonlari üzerİne etkİsİnİn İncelenmesİ. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2014; 15 (1):207-23. 25. Coldwell J, Craig A, Paterson T, Mustard J. Online students: Relationships between participation, demographics and academic performance. Electronic journal of e-learning 2008; 6 (1): 19-30. 26. Kintu MJ, Zhu C, Kagambe E. Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2017; 14 (1): 1-20. [ DOI:10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4] 27. Picciano AG, Seaman J. K-12 online learning: A survey of US school district administrators: ERIC; 2007.
|
