[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 13, Issue 4 (2021) ::
RME 2021, 13(4): 1-13 Back to browse issues page
Design and Validation of Instrument for Evaluating Indicators of Pedagogy in Sustainable Teaching- Learning Process in Higher Education
S Darabi * , N Azizi , J Salimi , N Shirbegi
PhD in Higher Education Development Planning, Faculty of Humanities, University of Kurdistan, Kurdistan, Iran , salman.d66@gmail.com
Abstract:   (2151 Views)
Introduction: In recent years, higher education has faced three major paradigm shifts: "Development of lifelong learning", "Democratization of knowledge" and "Development of the global knowledge community".  This study aims to design and validate a evaluating mechanism for the pedagogical elements and dimensions in sustainable teaching-learning processes in both public and private academic institutions.
Methods: This is an explanatory mixed method research design that has been done sequentially in two parts, qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, data was collected via semi-structured interviews. Participants including 17 experts and higher education specialists who were selected by purposive sampling method. In this section, inductive content analysis method was applied for data analysis and findings was validated by participants and colleagues. The model of  the quantitative section was descriptive-survey. For this 322 faculty members  in public and private universities were selected based on the Cochran's estimation for formulating sample size. A researcher- made questionnaire including 3 subscales was used for data collection respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software.
Result: The results of data analysis in the coding process led to the identification of 75 open codes, which were finally classified into 22 core categories and 3 selected codes (students, curriculum, professors).  In quantitative part, findings showed that it is sufficiently and appropriately could identify the components of sustainable pedagogy. The findings also showed that the current status of relevant indicators in public universities (2.99) is significantly higher than private universities (2.88) (p <0.05: t = 4.11).
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, it can be expressed, universities should move towards sustainability in order to maintain their stability in the current situation. Accordingly, one of the main indicators of a sustainable university is sustainable pedagogy, which has a sustainable strategy and a multifaceted view of the curriculum  and emphasizes on nurturing creative and intelligent students and up-to-date professors, and an academic identity that always seeks to strengthen the identity of professional citizens who could help a stable and pioneering society. Therefore, the findings of this study can be used in order to enrich the teaching-learning processes as much as possible.
Keywords: Higher Education, Teaching-learning, Sustainability, Pedagogy
Full-Text [PDF 626 kb]   (682 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Special
References
1. Darabi S, Neyestani M. [Identification and Prioritization of Strategic Planning Components in Virtual Education (A Qualitative Study in the Virtual Faculty of Isfahan University)]. Interdisciplinary. Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences 2014; 5(3): 47-56. [Persian]
2. Zou Y, Zhao W, Mason R. Comparing Sustainable Universities between the United States and China: Cases of Indiana University and Tsinghua University 2015;(7)9: 11817-11799. [DOI:10.3390/su70911799]
3. Cloud J. Education for a sustainable future: Benchmarks for individual and social learning. Journal of Sustainability Education 2016; 14: 1-29.
4. ULSF. The Talloires declaration, Association of University Leaders forSustainable Future. [Cited 2021 Sept 20 ]. Available from:www.ulsf.org/programs
5. Lockley J, Jarrath M. The Nature of Sustainability as Viewed by European Students. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 2013; 7 (1): 113- 124. [DOI:10.1177/0973408213495611]
6. Amiri E, Arasteh H. [The Role of Universities in Teaching Sustainable Development]. Science Cultivation 2012; 02(2): 29-36. [Persian]
7. Williams PM. University leadership for sustainability: An active dendritic framework for enabling connection and collaboration [dissertation]. Victoria University of Wellington; 2008.
8. Calder W, Dautremont J. Higher education: More and more laboratories for inventing a sustainable future. Agenda for a sustainable America 2009: 93-107.
9. Grecu V, Ipina N. The sustainable university-A model for the sustainable organization. Management of Sustainable Development 2014; 6(2): 15-24. [DOI:10.1515/msd-2015-0002]
10. Blessinger P. Rethinking higher education in the service of humanity. University World News. Available from: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20180711094726636
11. Lozano R, Ceulemans M, Alonso A, Huisingh F, Lozano T. A Review of Commitment and Implementation of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Results from a Worldwide Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015; 108: 1-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.113]
12. Lockley J, Jarrath M. The Nature of Sustainability as Viewed by European Students. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 2013; 7 (1): 113-24. [DOI:10.1177/0973408213495611]
13. Malekinia E, Bazargan A, Mozaffaruddin, [Identify and prioritize the components of a sustainable university]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2015; 20 (3): 26-2. [Persian]
14. Hamzeh Robati M, Mohajeran B, SeyedAbbaszadeh MM, Javadani H, Bazrafshan Moghaddam M.[Analysis of Sustainable Education Based on AHP Model in Higher Education: Combined Research].Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development 2018;7 (1): 19-36. [Persian]
15. Wang W, Ching G. Developing Sustainability Indicators for Higher Education Institutions in Taiwan. IJIET 2015; 5(12): 905-09. [DOI:10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.635]
16. Dawe G, Juker R, Martin S. Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Current Practice and Future Developments. A report for The Higher Education Academy.[Cited 2020Apr 02] Available from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/sustdevinHEfinalreport.pdf
17. Merck J, Beermann M.The Relevance of transdisciplinary teaching and learning for the successful integration of sustainability issues into higher education development.Springer ; 2015. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-10690-8_2]
18. Teadoreanu L. Engineering Education for Sustainable Development: A Strategic Framework for Universities. Annals of the Oradea University, Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering; 2013. [DOI:10.15660/AUOFMTE.2013-1.2860]
19. Gunawan G, Tarigan E, Prayogo DN, Mardiono L. Eco-sustainable campus initiatives: a web content analysis. InThe 3rd International Conference on Technology and Operations Management Sustaining Competitiveness through Green Technology Management; 2012 Jul 4 ; Bandung, Indonesia; 2012.
20. Rothchild M. Accountability Mechanisms in Public Multicampus Systems of Higher Education. University of Minnesota; 2011.
21. Velazquez L, Munguia N, Platt A, Taddei J. Sustainable university: what can be the matter?. Journal of cleaner production 2006;14(9-11):810-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.008]
22. Buckland H, Mingo M. Explorations on the University's role in society for sustainable development through a systems transition approach. Case study of the Technical University of Catalonia (TUC). Production 2009; 17(12):1075-1085. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.006]
23. KadKhodaei MS, Akhavan Tafti M, Rezayat Gh, Ahmadi P. [Designing a competency-based university education model for the humanities]. Iranian Journal of Higher Education 2018;(9)1:105-131.[ Persian]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Darabi S, Azizi N, Salimi J, Shirbegi N. Design and Validation of Instrument for Evaluating Indicators of Pedagogy in Sustainable Teaching- Learning Process in Higher Education. RME 2021; 13 (4) :1-13
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1118-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 4 (2021) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education