Trauma Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , mehdiraadabadi@gmail.com
Abstract: (338 Views)
Introduction: “Cultural distance” and “perceived discrimination” are two key factors that influence individuals’ experiences in cross-cultural environments, which can affect their satisfaction, academic performance, and even their intention to stay in the host country. International students, particularly those studying medical sciences, are especially exposed to these challenges due to their involvement in both educational and clinical settings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of cultural distance and perceived discrimination on the behavioral intentions of international students at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in 2024.
Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 106 international students enrolled in medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, in 2024. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire consisting of 27 items across five domains: perceived cultural distance (5 items), perceived discrimination (7 items), cognitive image (6 items), affective image (4 items), and behavioral intention (5 items). Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21) and SmartPLS (version 3). To evaluate construct validity and model fit, confirmatory factor analysis, factor loadings, Cronbach’s alpha, Composite Reliability, and Average Variance Extracted were employed. Structural Equation Modeling was also applied to test the study's hypotheses.
Results: The results indicated that the average perceived cultural distance among students was 3.69 (SD= 0.78). The findings revealed that perceived cultural distance had a positive and significant influence on both cognitive (β = 0.221, P < 0.001) and affective (β = 0.258, P < 0.001) destination images. It also had a small but positive effect on international students’ behavioral intentions (β = 0.057, P=0.012). In contrast, perceived discrimination had a negative and significant impact on cognitive (β = -0.416, P < 0.001) and affective destination images (β = -0.494, P < 0.001). The mediating role of cognitive destination image in the relationship between perceived cultural distance and behavioral intentions was positive and significant (β = 0.023, P=0.005). At the same time, it was negative and significant in the relationship between perceived discrimination and behavioral intentions (β = -0.044, P=0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that perceived cultural distance and perceived discrimination have a significant impact on international students’ cognitive and affective destination images, which, in turn, shape their behavioral intentions. Improving destination image and reducing cultural distance and discrimination can boost students’ positive behavioral intentions. Therefore, university administrators should strive to eliminate cultural and social barriers and create a more welcoming environment for international students.
Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 106 international students enrolled in medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, in 2024. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire consisting of 27 items across five domains: perceived cultural distance (5 items), perceived discrimination (7 items), cognitive image (6 items), affective image (4 items), and behavioral intention (5 items). Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21) and SmartPLS (version 3). To evaluate construct validity and model fit, confirmatory factor analysis, factor loadings, Cronbach’s alpha, Composite Reliability, and Average Variance Extracted were employed. Structural Equation Modeling was also applied to test the study's hypotheses.
Results: The results indicated that the average perceived cultural distance among students was 3.69 (SD= 0.78). The findings revealed that perceived cultural distance had a positive and significant influence on both cognitive (β = 0.221, P < 0.001) and affective (β = 0.258, P < 0.001) destination images. It also had a small but positive effect on international students’ behavioral intentions (β = 0.057, P=0.012). In contrast, perceived discrimination had a negative and significant impact on cognitive (β = -0.416, P < 0.001) and affective destination images (β = -0.494, P < 0.001). The mediating role of cognitive destination image in the relationship between perceived cultural distance and behavioral intentions was positive and significant (β = 0.023, P=0.005). At the same time, it was negative and significant in the relationship between perceived discrimination and behavioral intentions (β = -0.044, P=0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that perceived cultural distance and perceived discrimination have a significant impact on international students’ cognitive and affective destination images, which, in turn, shape their behavioral intentions. Improving destination image and reducing cultural distance and discrimination can boost students’ positive behavioral intentions. Therefore, university administrators should strive to eliminate cultural and social barriers and create a more welcoming environment for international students.
Keywords: Affective Destination Image, Behavioral Intention, Cognitive Destination Image, Cultural Distance, Discrimination
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
research management
References
1. Shenkar O. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. J Int Bus Stud. 2001;32(3):519-535. [DOI:10.1057/jibs.2011.40]
2. Ahn MJ, McKercher B. The effect of cultural distance on tourism: A study of international visitors to Hong Kong. Asia Pac J Tour Res. 2015;20(1):94-113. [DOI:10.1080/10941665.2013.866586]
3. Yu J, Li H, Xiao H. Are authentic tourists happier? Examining structural relationships amongst perceived cultural distance, existential authenticity, and wellbeing. Intern J Tour Res. 2020;22(1):144-54. [DOI:10.1002/jtr.2324]
4. Woosnam KM, Stylidis D, Ivkov M. Explaining conative destination image through cognitive and affective destination image and emotional solidarity with residents. J Sustain Tour. 2020;28(6):917-35. [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2019.1708920]
5. Akgün AE, Senturk HA, Keskin H, Onal I. The relationships among nostalgic emotion, destination images and tourist behaviors: An empirical study of Istanbul. J Destin Mark Manag. 2019;16(1). [DOI:10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.03.009]
6. Zhang H, Cho T, Wang H, Ge Q. The influence of cross-cultural awareness and tourist experience on authenticity, tourist satisfaction and acculturation in world cultural heritage sites of Korea. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):927. [DOI:10.3390/su10040927]
7. Jamaludin N, Sam D, Sandal G, Adam A. The influence of perceived discrimination, orientation to mainstream culture and life satisfaction on destination loyalty intentions: the case of international students. Curr Issues Tour. 2016;21(8):934-49. [DOI:10.1080/13683500.2015.1119102]
8. Guan M, So J. Social identity theory. Int Encycl Health Commun. 2022;1-5. [DOI:10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0667]
9. Van Knippenberg D. Developing the social identity theory of leadership: Leader agency in leader group prototypicality. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2023;17(4):e12739. [DOI:10.1111/spc3.12739]
10. Phinney JS, Berry JW, Vedder P, Liebkind K. The acculturation experience: attitudes, identities, and behaviors of immigrant youth. Immigrant youth in cultural transition. A3 book chapter. Psychology Press. 2006;71-116. [DOI:10.4324/9780415963619-4]
11. Yang F, He Y, Xia Z. The effect of perceived discrimination on cross-cultural adaptation of international students: moderating roles of autonomous orientation and integration strategy. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(23):1-14. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03106-x]
12. Duru E, Poyrazli S. Perceived discrimination, social connectedness, and other predictors of adjustment difficulties among Turkish international students. Int J Psychol. 2011;46(6):446-54. [DOI:10.1080/00207594.2011.585158]
13. Chauv J, Gamst G, Meyers LS, Kernes JL, Der-Karabetian A. Perceived discrimination and Asian cultural values are associated with beliefs about psychological services among Chinese international students. Int J Intercult Relat. 2022;91(2):138-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.10.003]
14. Neto F. Loneliness among African international students at Portuguese universities. J Int Students. 2021;11(2): 397-416. [DOI:10.32674/jis.v11i2.1379]
15. Ramia G. Crises in international education, and government responses: a comparative analysis of racial discrimination and violence towards international students. High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(3):599-613. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-021-00684-w]
16. Lee C-H, Chen H-S, Liou G-B, Tsai B-K, Hsieh C-M. Evaluating international tourists' perceptions on cultural distance and recreation demand. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4360. [DOI:10.3390/su10124360]
17. Pesch R, Bouncken RB. The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international alliances: How perceived cultural distance influences trust and task discourse to drive new product development performance. Cross Cult Strateg Manag. 2017;24(1):33-54. [DOI:10.1108/CCSM-03-2016-0065]
18. Tabibeh RF. City of Yazd today, a general overview of a World Heritage historic city. L'architettura delle città - JSS Ludovico Quaroni. 2020;13(17). [Link]
19. Le Hong V, Hsu L. The effects of perceived cultural distance and perceived discrimination on the destination image and behaviour intention of international student tourists in Taiwan. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2024;58:16-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.11.010]
20. Chávez LM, Canino G. Toolkit on translating and adapting instruments. Human Services Research Institute; 2005. [Link]
21. Ng SI, Lee JA, Soutar GN. Tourists' intention to visit a country: The impact of cultural distance. Tour Manag. 2007;28(6):1497-506. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.11.005]
22. Bi J, Gu C. Cultural distance and international tourists' intention to visit a destination. Asia Pac J Tour Res. 2019;24(8):839-49. [DOI:10.1080/10941665.2019.1635503]
23. Yang S, Isa SM, Yao Y, Xia J, Liu D. Cognitive image, affective image, cultural dimensions, and conative image: A new conceptual framework. Front Psychol. 2022;13:935814. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935814]
24. Karadag E, Tekel E, Su A, Kocaturk M, Ergin-Kocaturk H, Polat M. International medical students in Türkiye: a cross-sectional study on their reasons for choosing Türkiye and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1171. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06200-9]
25. Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(4):531-54. [DOI:10.1037/a0016059]
26. Schmitt MT, Branscombe NR, Postmes T, Garcia A. The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):921-28. [DOI:10.1037/a0035754]
27. Yoon E, Hacker J, Hewitt A, Abrams M, Cleary S. Social connectedness, discrimination, and social status as mediators of acculturation/enculturation and well-being. J Couns Psychol. 2012;59(1):86-96. [DOI:10.1037/a0025366]
28. Anjorin O, Bakeroot VL, Zanting A, Krumeich A, Busari JO. Exploring the effect of discrimination on ethnic minority medical students' mental well-being in the Netherlands. Trends High Educ. 2023;2(4):570-84. [DOI:10.3390/higheredu2040034]
29. Mazzarol T, Soutar GN. "Push‐pull" factors influencing international student destination choice. Int J Educ Manag. 2002;16(2):82-90. [DOI:10.1108/09513540210418403]
30. Baloglu S, McCleary KW. A model of destination image formation. Ann Tourism Res. 1999;26(4):868-97. [DOI:10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4]
31. Yang F, Song Y, Yang Y, Wang R, Xia Z. The influence of study abroad experience on the destination loyalty of international students: Mediating effects of emotional solidarity and destination image. J Vac Mark. 2024;30(2):245-60. [DOI:10.1177/13567667221127391]
32. Wu H-p, Garza E, Guzman N. International students' challenge and adjustment to college. Educ Res Int. 2015;2015(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1155/2015/202753]
33. Zhang J, Goodson P. Predictors of international students' psychosocial adjustment to life in the United States: A systematic review. Int J Intercult Relat. 2011;35(2):139-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.11.011]
34. Liu H. Understanding destination choice from a cultural distance perspective. Open Access Thesis. University of South Carolina - Columbia; 2014. [Link]
35. Lee JJ, Rice C. Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. High Educ. 2007;53(3):381-409. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-005-4508-3]
36. Smith RA, Khawaja NG. A review of the acculturation experiences of international students. Int Intercult Relat. 2011;35(6):699-713. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.004]
37. Leong FT. Cultural accommodation as method and metaphor. Am Psychol. 2007;62(8): 913-27. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.916]
38. Ward C, Bochner B, Furnham A. The psychology of culture shock. 1st ed. Routledge; 2001. [DOI:10.4324/9781003070696]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
