[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 16, Issue 1 (2024) ::
Research in Medical Education 2024, 16(1): 66-73 Back to browse issues page
Comparison The Effect of Two Educational Methods (Widcast and Traditional) on Nursing Care Knowledge for Gastrointestinal Scopes in Nursing Students
Sima Aten , Afsaneh Dehnad , Nasrin Abbasi Dryasari , Zohreh Sohrabi *
Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , zo-sohrabi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (123 Views)
Introduction: Using innovative teaching methods in response to rapid changes in the needs of communities is fundamental necessity. Virtual education and its diversity compared to traditional methods raise the question of which one will be more effective in achieving educational goals. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of video-based and traditional teaching methods on nursing students' knowledge of gastrointestinal endoscopy care.
Methods: This semi-experimental study was conducted on 80 third-year nursing students at Iran University of Medical Sciences who were randomly divided into two groups of traditional and virtual (video-based) training in the practical unit of gastrointestinal endoscopy at Firouzgar Hospital. To evaluate participants` knowledge a specialized 25-question test was administered before and after traditional and video-based training for both groups. Data were analyzed using Descriptive statistics including independent T-test and paired T -test through SPSS.
Results: A total of 80 nursing students participated in the study. The mean age of individuals in the traditional training group was 23.80±3.23 years and in the virtual training group was 21.80±0.21 years. There was no significant difference in the mean pre-training knowledge score between the video-based and traditional groups. Although after intervention, increase in knowledge of video-based group were observed.
Conclusion: This study showed that implementing video-based teaching methods leads to a greater increase in nursing knowledge compared to traditional methods in nursing students. Therefore, developing educational programs using such methods can play a useful role in improving nursing students' knowledge and training nurses with sufficient practical awareness and can replace traditional methods..
Keywords: Nurse, Gastrointestinal, Education, Endoscopy, Virtual Education Widcast
Full-Text [PDF 279 kb]   (45 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Educational technology, e-Learning,Virtual Education
References
1. Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, Payne-Gagnon J, et al. Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews. Journal of medical Internet research 2019; 21 (10): e15118. [DOI:10.2196/15118]
2. O'Connor S, Odewusi T, Smith PM, Booth RG. Digital professionalism on social media: The opinions of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today 2022; 111: 105322. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105322]
3. Voutilainen A, Saaranen T, Sormunen M. Conventional vs. e-learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2017; 50: 97-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.020]
4. Buckland M, Dye CM. The Development of Electronic Distance Education Delivery Systems in the United States. Recurring and Emerging Themes in History and Philosophy of Education. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue. [Cited 2024 May 28]. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/145739/.
5. Liao N, Scherzer R, Kim EH. Effective methods of clinical education. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology: official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 2021; 128(3):240-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2021.11.021]
6. Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, Payne-Gagnon J, Hudson E, Dubois CA, et al. Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(10): e15118. [DOI:10.2196/15118]
7. Nicoll P, MacRury S, van Woerden HC, Smyth K. Evaluation of Technology-Enhanced Learning Programs for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20 (4): e131. [DOI:10.2196/jmir.9085]
8. Légaré F, Freitas A, Thompson-Leduc P, Borduas F, Luconi F, Boucher A, et al. The majority of accredited continuing professional development activities do not target clinical behavior change. Academic medicine 2015; 90 (2): 197-202. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000543]
9. Oguro M, Sakurai S, Htay NN, Horiuchi S. Voices from undergraduate students and faculty members regarding the status and challenges of baccalaureate nursing education in Myanmar: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today 2022; 109: 105253. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105253]
10. Zhu Y, Pei X, Chen X. Faculty's experience in developing and implementing concept-based teaching of baccalaureate nursing education in the Chinese context: A descriptive qualitative research study. Nurse Educ Today 2022; 108: 105126. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105126]
11. Fayaz A, Mazahery A, Hosseinzadeh M, Yazdanpanah S. Video-based Learning Versus Traditional Method for Preclinical Course of Complete Denture Fabrication. Journal of dentistry 2015; 16 (1 Suppl): 21-8.
12. Dhir SK, Verma D, Batta M, Mishra D. E-Learning in Medical Education in India. Indian pediatrics 2017; 54 (10): 871-7. [DOI:10.1007/s13312-017-1152-9]
13. Chuang YH, Lai FC, Chang CC, Wan HT. Effects of a skill demonstration video delivered by smartphone on facilitating nursing students' skill competencies and self-confidence: A randomized controlled trial study. Nurse Educ Today 2018; 66: 63-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.027]
14. van de Steeg L, R IJ, Wagner C, Langelaan M. The effect of an e-learning course on nursing staff's knowledge of delirium: a before-and-after study. BMC medical education 2015; 15: 12. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-015-0289-2]
15. Khoobi M, Mohammadi N, Ahmadi Hedayat M, Ghiyasvandiyan S, Varaei S.[Comparison of the nursing students' learning in two teaching methods using CD and training through traditional method]. Journal of Nursing Education 2017; 5 (6): 18-23.[Persian] [DOI:10.21859/jne-05063]
16. Melender HL, Salmela S, Pape B. A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Basics of Evidence-Based Practice Educational Intervention for Health and Social Care Professionals. SAGE open nursing. 2020; 6: 1-11. [DOI:10.1177/2377960820925959]
17. O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review. BMC medical education 2018; 18: 130. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0]
18. Hinkle JL, Cheever KH, HinkleJL. Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing. 14th ed. Philadelphia:Wolters Kluwer; 2023.
19. Beilenhoff U, Waagenes WJ , Pater-Godthelp M. Principles of Nursing in Adult Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Under the auspices of the European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates.Springer ;2024.
20. Habibzadeh H, Rahmani A, Rahimi B, Rezai SA, Aghakhani N, Hosseinzadegan F. Comparative study of virtual and traditional teaching methods on the interpretation of cardiac dysrhythmia in nursing students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2019; 8: 202. [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_34_19]
21. Norouzi J, Jafari Golestan N, Pishgooie SAH.[Comparison of the Effect of Lecture Training and Multimedia Training on Knowledge, Attitude and Nurses Emergency Performance in Applying a Communication Model in Registration and Reporting in Selected Military Hospitals]. Military Caring Sciences 2020; 6 (4 ): 257-66. [Persian]
22. Mohseni M, Mahbobi M, Sayadi AR, Shabani Z, Asadpour M.[The Effect of an Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model on the Standard Precautions among Medical Students of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences]. RME 2015; 7 (1): 63-72. [Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.7.1.63]
23. Bahrambeygi F, Roozbahani R, Shojaeizadeh D, Sadeghi R, Nasiri S, Ghazanchaei E, et al. Evaluation of the Effects of E-Learning on Nurses' Behavior and Knowledge Regarding Venous Thromboembolism. Tanaffos 2019; 18 (4): 338-45.
24. Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C, López-Domene E, Hernández-Padilla JM, Preto LS, Castro-Sánchez AM. Effects of web-based electrocardiography simulation on strategies and learning styles. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 2015; 49 (4): 650-6. [DOI:10.1590/S0080-623420150000400016]
25. Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H. The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of computing in higher education 2022; 34 (1): 21-38. [DOI:10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2]
26. Li S, Zhang C, Liu Q, Tong K. E-Learning during COVID-19: perspectives and experiences of the faculty and students. BMC medical education 2022; 22 (1): 328. [DOI]
27. Varaei S, Afshar Nasr P, Bahrani N, Mohamadi K.[The Comparison of the Effects of Electronic Education with Workshop Education on Knowledge of Nursing Students about Patient's Rights]. Sci J Hamadan Nurs Midwifery Fac 2018; 26 (1): 19 - 25. [Persian]
28. McDonald EW, Boulton JL, Davis JL. E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge - An integrative review. Nurse education today 2018; 66: 166-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.011]
29. Chen FQ, Leng YF. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Nursing Education: Meta-Analysis. Journal of medical Internet research 2020; 22 (9): e18290. [DOI:10.2196/18290]
30. Syed S, Rastogi A, Bansal A, Kumar A, Jindal A, Prakash A, et al. Future of e-Learning in Medical Education-Perception, Readiness, and Challenges in a Developing Country. Frontiers in Education 2021; 6: 598309. [DOI:10.3389/feduc.2021.598309]
31. Shahalizade M, Musavi S. The Perspective of e-learning in Higher Education: A Systematized Review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences 2021; 12 (3): 149-61.
32. Button D, Harrington A, Belan I. E-learning & information communication technology (ICT) in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 34 (10): 1311-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.002]
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aten S, Dehnad A, Abbasi Dryasari N, Sohrabi Z. Comparison The Effect of Two Educational Methods (Widcast and Traditional) on Nursing Care Knowledge for Gastrointestinal Scopes in Nursing Students. Research in Medical Education 2024; 16 (1) :66-73
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1234-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 16, Issue 1 (2024) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education