[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 15, Issue 3 (2023) ::
RME 2023, 15(3): 25-38 Back to browse issues page
Accreditation of the Family Medicine Residency Training Programme in Universities of Medical Sciences(UMS) of Iran
A Heidarzadeh , I Dadgaran * , F Mohseni , H Khoshrang , R Ghorbandoost , M Javanak , N Dadgaran , M Taheri , N Pourvakhshori , S Fallah-Bousari
Medical Education Research Center, Education Development Center.Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , i.dadgaran@gmail.com
Abstract:   (299 Views)
Introduction: Family medicine expertise as one of the most important policies have been proposed in the field of education and health system in the last decade.The aim of this study is the accreditation of the family physician residency in  medical sciences universities in Iran.
Method: This is an accreditation and evaluation study that was implemented by the General Medical Council Secretariat of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) in collaboration with the Medical Education Research Center of Guilan University of Medical Sciences and the World Health Organization. The implementation process of this project was in two stages of internal evaluation and external evaluation in 12 universities of medical sciences of the country that were training the specialized course of family medicine and the sampling method was based on the entire research community. The family medicine specialty standards questionnaire designed by WONCA (2013 and 2016 editions) was used for internal evaluation. The translation and localization of the said questionnaire was done using the Backward- Forward method. After translation, the questionnaire was provided to the universities through the correspondence of the secretariat of the General Medical Council with 12 universities of the country. At the beginning of the internal evaluation, the self- evaluation forms were sent to universities.
After the internal evaluation by the universities, an external evaluation was conducted. Then the members of the scientific committee determined the external evaluators to monitor the activities of the twelve universities. Data were analyzed in two quantitative and qualitative methods through SPSS. The information obtained from documents and interviews was analyzed qualitatively. In order to match the results of internal and external evaluation as well as the compatibility of documents with reports, a comparative evaluation was done by external evaluators and the research team.
Results: According to the results of the internal and external evaluations and the opinions of the evaluators, the final decision regarding the accreditation of the specialized family medicine residency by universities was issued by the research team. Based on this decision, 2 universities of medical sciences partially approved the program (3 years); 3 University of Medical Sciences partial approval of the program (2 years); 2 University of Medical Sciences partial approval of the program (1 year); And 1 University of Medical Sciences received conditional approval of the program (6 months) and 4 Universities of Medical Sciences received non- approval.
Conclusion: The results of this study are a guide to promote the strengths and eliminate the weaknesses in the implementation of the existing program for universities of medical sciences and a source for decision-making at the macro level and the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education to grant permission to continue the work, and the activity of the universities is to train the specialized course of family medicine.

 
Keywords: Accreditation, Evaluation, Medical Education, Family Medicine, Residency
Full-Text [PDF 548 kb]   (112 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Ministry of Health and Medical Educatio.[Educational program and criteria of family physician specialty]. Tehran. Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2015. [Persian]
2. Mohammadian M, VafaeeNajar A, NejatzadehganEidgahi Z, Jajarmi H, Hooshmand E. [Reviewing the Challenges of Family Physician Program from the Perspective of Managers and Doctors in North Khorasan province 2017]. Journal of Paramedicine and Rehabilitation Sciences of Mashhad 2018; 7 (1): 14- 24. [Persian]
3. Jabari A, Sharifirad G, Shokri A, BahmanZiari N, Kordi A.[Overview of the Performance of Rural Family Physician in Iran]. Health Inf Manage 2013; 9 (7): 1132- 45. [Persian]
4. Reiesian Sh, Eslamian M, Azmal M, Bastani P, Kalhor R.[Assessment Of Urban Family Physician Program In Pilot Centers Covered By Ahvaz Jundishapur University Of Medical Sciences]. payavard Salamat 2013; 7 (1) :11-20. [Persian]
5. Family Medicine Residency. [Cited 2019 Aug10]. Available from: http://etums.tums.ac.ir/Default. aspx? PageID=95 [Persian]
6. Family Medicine Residents Official Website of Iranian Family Physicians. [Cited 2019 Oct22]. Available from: http://www.iranianfamilyphysicians.com [Persian]
7. EDC of Isfahan. Operational Program of Accreditation and Appraisal Unit. [Cited 2018 Jul 18]. Available from: http://edc.mui.ac.ir/fa [Persian]
8. Pazargadi M, Peyravi H A, Pourkhoshbakht Y, Alavi Mojed H, Azizi F.[Proposing an Accreditation Model for Medical Universities of Iran]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2001; 1 (4) :26-35. [Persian]
9. Hakkak M, Hozni SA, Shahsiah N, Akhlaghi T.[Design of Hospital Accreditation Model: A Qualitative Study]. Management Strategies in Health System 2017; 2 (3) :201- 14. [Persian]
10. Tabrizi J, Kabiri N, Abdollahi L, Yari Fard K, Saadati M, Daemi A, et al.[Developing Accreditation Measures for Adapted Model of Clinics' Accreditation and Accrediting the Clinic of Tabriz Aali Nasab Hospital Using this Model in 2012]. Depiction of Health 2014; 4 (4): 26- 30. [Persian]
11. Mirzadeh A, Tavakoli S, Yazdani K, Taj M. Accreditation: A Way to Quality Assurance and Improvement. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2004; 4 (2): 105- 16. [Persian]
12. MacLellan A M, Brailovsky C, Rainsberry P, Bowmer I, Desrochers M. Examination outcomes for international medical graduates pursuing or completing family medicine residency training in Quebec. Canadian Family Physician 2010; 56 (9): 912- 8.
13. Miri A, Sanainasab H, Khajeazad M, Mohtashami R. [Assessment of the Implementation of the Standards of the World Federation of Medical Education (WFME) during the Internship Period of One of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2018; 11 (1): 148 -56. [Persian]
14. Nejatifar F, Gharib C, Monfared A, Shenavar I, Alavi SA, Hojati A, et al.[Internal evaluation of residency training course in internal medicine of Guilan University of Medical Sciences in 2022]. Research in Medical Education 2022; 14 (1): 79- 88. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/rme.14.1.79]
15. Gibson C, Ladak F, Shrestha A, Yadav B, Thu K, Aye T. Use of WONCA global standards to evaluate family medicine postgraduate education for curriculum development and review in Nepal and Myanmar. Education for Primary Care 2016; 27 (5): 351- 7. [DOI:10.1080/14739879.2016.1218798]
16. Narenji Thani F, Jamaladdini H, Rouhani S.[Identification and evaluation of internal factors related tothe education management system in the Red Crescent Society of the Islamic Republic of Iran]. Journal of Medicine and Spiritual Cultivation 2019; 28 (1): 79- 102. [Persian]
17. Mirzaei A, Sadeghifar J, Mousavi SM, Khodayari R. Internal Evaluation in Selected Educational Groups of Faculty of Medicine in Ilam University of Medical Sciences (A Short Report). Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences 2013; 12 (1): 71- 8. [Persian]
18. Sereshti M, Banaeian S, Delaram M, Kazemian A, Safdari Dehcheshme F, Karami A, et al. [Internal Evaluation of Midwifery Department, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences]. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2019; 11 (5):191- 9. [Persian]
19. Al- Khathami AD. Evaluation of Saudi family medicine training program: The application of CIPP evaluation format. Medical teacher 2012; 34 (sup1): S81- S9. [DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.656752]
20. Dobbie A, Kelly P, Sylvia E, Freeman J. Evaluating family medicine residency COPC programs: meeting the challenge. Family Medicine- Kansas City 2006; 38 (6): 399.
21. Eden AR, Peterson LE. Impact of potential accreditation and certification in family medicine maternity care. Fam Med 2017; 49 (1): 14- 21.
22. David AK. Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4): residency training in family medicine for the future. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2007; 20 (4): 332- 41. [DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2007.04.070081]
23. Hosseini M, Tabrizchi N.The Trend of Family Physician in Iran and Selected Countries of the World. Iran J Cult Health Promot 2022; 6 (1) :12-18.
24. Buchman S. It's about time: 3-year FM residency training. Canadian Family Physician 2012; 58 (9): 1045.
25. Fowler N, Lemire F, Oandasan I, Wyman R. The evolution of residency training in family medicine: a Canadian perspective. Family Medicine 2021; 53 (7): 595- 8. [DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2021.718541]
26. Scherger JE. Preparing the personal physician for practice (P4): essential skills for new family physicians and how residency programs may provide them. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2007; 20 (4): 348- 55. [DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2007.04.070059]
27. Khazaei MR, Zanganeh F, Eftekhari LM, Rezaei M. Characteristics of the Internal Evaluations of the Educational Groups in Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Educational Research in Medical Sciences 2021; 10 (1): e115443. [DOI:10.5812/erms.115443]
28. Maniate JM. Redesigning a resident program evaluation to strengthen the Canadian residency education accreditation system. Academic Medicine 2010; 85 (7): 1196- 202. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e1a73b]
29. Bazargan A.[Rethinking about continuous quality assessment in Iran higher education: Need for strengthening national evaluation agencies and framework revision.]Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2022; 27 (4): 1- 23. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/irphe.27.4.1]
30. Tomlinson M. Conceptions of the value of higher education in a measured market. Higher Education 2018; 75 (4): 711- 27. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-017-0165-6]
31. WONCA. WONCA Global Standards on PostgraduateFamily Medicine Education [Cited 2013 Feb14]. Available from: https://www.woncaeurope.org
Send email to the article author


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Heidarzadeh A, Dadgaran I, Mohseni F, Khoshrang H, Ghorbandoost R, Javanak M, et al . Accreditation of the Family Medicine Residency Training Programme in Universities of Medical Sciences(UMS) of Iran. RME 2023; 15 (3) :25-38
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-1252-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 15, Issue 3 (2023) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education