[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access Policy
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 4 (2019) ::
RME 2019, 11(4): 35-44 Back to browse issues page
Design, implementation and evaluation of teaching module of liquid dosage form in a Flipped Classroom for pharmacy students
E Aboutaleb , A Motavallian , I Dadgaran , S Manoochehri *
Medical Education Research Center, Education Development Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran and Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, , saeedmanoochehri@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3213 Views)
Introduction: Flipped classroom represents a kind of blended learning in which educational content is delivered outside the classroom and classwork activities is done in the classroom.This study with the purpose of designing, implementing and evaluating of teaching dosage forms with flipped classroom method for pharmacy students has been done.
Methods: This was a SoTL (Scholarship of Teaching & Learning) developmental study. It was performed as a flipped classroom for all pharmacy students (34 people) of the fifth term at Guilan University of Medical Sciences.The teacher distributed the content in a CD of PowerPoint to be studied. Subsequently, after a week, the students were  divided into six groups in the class, and the questions were proposed with handling a problem based small group strategy. With regard to evaluating, a focus group interview was conducted with the participation of 10 students who purposefully were choosen. Analysis of qualitative contents of data from focus group interviews was prepared by MAXQDA10 software.
Results: 34 students were participated in a study who 68% represent women and 32% represent men with 21 ± 0.5 average age. Evaluation results were extracted as 155 primary codes contain 4 main groups and 11 categories. Main group’s categories were attraction (innovation, challenge, subject and amusement), cheerful atmosphere (cooperation, engagement), preparedness (pre-reading, content type, volume of content) and class management (grouping, management of evaluation).
Conclusion: This method created more attractive and motivational than traditional learning. As the content was already presented to the students; by asking questions and interacting with students, the class was dropped out of teacher-centered and students were more willing to participate. Additionally, because of the applied contentof lesson, the level of engagement, discussion, and challenge was great.
Keywords: Learning, Pharmacy, Teaching methods, Qualitative, Evaluation
Full-Text [PDF 480 kb]   (831 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Patanwala AE, Erstad BL, Murphy JE. Student use of flipped classroom videos in a therapeutics course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 2017;9(1):50-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.043]
2. Roehl A, Reddy SL, Shannon GJJJoF, Sciences C. The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences 2013;105(2):44-9. [DOI:10.14307/JFCS105.2.12]
3. Munir M, Baroutian S, Young BR, Carter SJEfCE. Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers 2018;23:25-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001]
4. Awidi IT, Paynter M. The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education 2019;128:269-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013]
5. Olakanmi EE. The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students' performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2017; 26(1):127-37. [DOI:10.1007/s10956-016-9657-x]
6. Cohen DK, Raudenbush SW, Ball DL. Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2003; 25(2): 119-142. [DOI:10.3102/01623737025002119]
7. McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic medicine 2014;89(2):236-43. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086]
8. Pierce R, Fox J. Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a "flipped classroom" model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American journal of pharmaceutical education 2012; 76(10):196. [DOI:10.5688/ajpe7610196]
9. Bhagat KK, Chang CN, Chang CY. The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 2016;19(3):134-42.
10. Ramakrishnan N, Priya MJ. Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom in Mathematics Teaching. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah 2016;4(10):57-62. [DOI:10.5539/elt.v10n5p62]
11. Cotta KI, Shah S, Almgren MM, Macías-Moriarity LZ, Mody VJCiPT, Learning. Effectiveness of flipped classroom instructional model in teaching pharmaceutical calculations. 2016;8(5):646-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2016.06.011]
12. Kangwantas K, Pongwecharak J, Rungsardthong K, Jantarathaneewat K, Sappruetthikun P, Maluangnon K. Implementing a flipped classroom approach to a course module in fundamental nutrition for pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education 2017; 17(1):329-334.
13. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day.1st ed. International society for technology in education 2012.
14. Moffett J. Twelve tips for "flipping" the classroom. Medical teacher 2015;37(4):331-6. [DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2014.943710]
15. Strayer JF. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research 2012;15(2):171-93. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4]
16. Chiang TH. Analysis of learning behavior in a flipped programing classroom adopting problem-solving strategies. Interactive Learning Environments 2017;25(2):189-202. [DOI:10.1080/10494820.2016.1276084]
17. Toothaker RJNet. Millennial's perspective of clicker technology in a nursing classroom: A Mixed methods research study. Nurse Education Today 2018;62:80-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027]
18. Wang FH. An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system.Computers & Education 2017; 114:79-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012]
19. Connell GL, Donovan DA, Chambers TG. Increasing the use of student-centered pedagogies from moderate to high improves student learning and attitudes about biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education 2016;15:1-15. [DOI:10.1187/cbe.15-03-0062]
20. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA. Cooperative learning:Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in UniversityTeaching 2014;25(4):1-26.
21. Cavanagh M. Students' experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Learning in Higher Education 2011;12(1):23-33. [DOI:10.1177/1469787410387724]
22. Herrmann KJ. The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active learning in higher education 2013;14(3):175-87. [DOI:10.1177/1469787413498035]
23. Backer JM, Miller JL, Timmer SM. The Effects of Collaborative Grouping on Student Engagement in Middle School Students. [Cited 2019 Jun 25]. Available from: https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/280.
24. Beatty BJ, Albert M. Student perceptions of a flipped classroom management course. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 2016;8(3):316-28. [DOI:10.1108/JARHE-09-2015-0069]
25. Zainuddin Z, Perera CJ. Exploring students' competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2019;43(1):115-26. [DOI:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916]
26. de Araujo Z, Otten S, Birisci S. Mathematics teachers' motivations for, conceptions of, and experiences with flipped instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education 2017;62:60-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.006]
27. Yilmaz R. Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior 2017;70:251-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085]
28. Jovanović J, Gašević D, Dawson S, Pardo A, Mirriahi N, Education H. Learning Analytics to Unveil Learning Strategies in a Flipped Classroom. The Internet and Higher Education 2017;33(4):74-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001]
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aboutaleb E, Motavallian A, Dadgaran I, Manoochehri S. Design, implementation and evaluation of teaching module of liquid dosage form in a Flipped Classroom for pharmacy students. RME 2019; 11 (4) :35-44
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-745-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 4 (2019) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education