Comparative Study of Morning Report in Conventional & Evidence Based Medicine forms, from the Viewpoint of Medical Students

Farhadifar, F; Bahrami, M; Yousefi, F; Farazi, E; Bahrami, A

doi:10.18869/acadpub.rme.8.1.47

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Registered in

Open Access Policy

Volume 8, Issue 1 (2016)

RME 2016, 8(1): 47-56

Back to browse issues page

Comparative Study of Morning Report in Conventional & Evidence Based Medicine forms, from the Viewpoint of Medical Students

F Farhadifar, M Bahrami ^*, F Yousefi, E Farazi, A Bahrami

Student Research Committee, Kurdistan University of medical sciences, sanandaj, Iran , mitra_bahrami66@yahoo.com

Abstract: (7282 Views)

Introduction: One of the most important educational method in medical sciences is Morning Report. Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is a new approach that has been considered to improve the quality of clinical care. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare of morning report in regular & Evidence Based Medicine from the viewpoint of medical students.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 students in OB&GYN departments of Besat hospital in Sanandaj in 2014. Sampling was done through consensus. Data was collected by a researcher- made questionnaire that include 3 Section and 26 Items including Demographic and educational factors, information about Structure and content of morning report, and Section about Improving students skills in regular and EBM method. The reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85. Data was analyzed by SPSS software and T-test and Chi-square test.

Result: The results showed that 85 students (97%) declare 8 (A.M) as suitable time of holding morning Report in Routine and EBM group. The average duration of Morning Report in EBM group was 42.10 minutes and in Routine group was 38.6 minutes. There was significant difference between EBM and regular in presenting feedback (P< 0/04), participation and interaction between the audiences (P< 0/003) so that in EBM group was observed more than routine group. There was no significant difference between EBM and Routine group in the number of patients, the type of disease and time Case Presentation (p>0.05). In EBM group students ability was promoted more than routine group (p<0.04).

Conclusion: Conditions of Morning Report structure was observed within acceptable level in two groups. To improve Morning Report it should be more emphasized on the structure and content of meetings such as feedback, participation and interaction between the audiences and subjects about promoting the ability of students.

Keywords: Morning Report, Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Evidence Based Medicine (EBM), Clinical

Full-Text [PDF 345 kb] (1972 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Clinical Education

References

1. Amin Z, Guajardo J, Wisniewski W, Bordage G, Tekian A, Niederman LG: Morning report: focus and methods over the past three decades. Acad Med 2000; 75 (10): 1-5.

2. Ways M, Kroenke K, Umali J, Buchwald D. Morning report. A survey of resident attitudes. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155 (13): 1433 -7.

3. Moharari R, Soleymani H, Nejati A, Rezaeefar A, Khashayar P, Meysamie A. [Evaluation of morning report in an emergency medicine department]. Emerg Med J 2010; 27 (1): 32-6. [Persian].

4. Banks DE, Shi R, Timm DF, Christopher KA, Duggar DC, Comegys M, et al. Decreased hospital length of stay associated with presentation of cases at morning report with librarian support. J Med Libr Assoc 2007; 95 (4): 381-7.

5. Barbour GL, Young MN. Morning report. Role of the clinical librarian. JAMA 1986; 255 (14): 1921-2.

6. Collin TB. Students’ expectations and their answer-changing behavior. Psychological Reports 1977; 41 (1): 163-6.

7. Wenger NS, Shpiner RB. An analysis of morning report: implications for internal medicine education. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993; 119 (5): 395-9.

8. Pupa LE Jr, Carpenter JL. Morning report: a successful format. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145: 897 -9.

9. Ramratnam B, Kelly G, Mega A, Tilkemeier P, Schiffman FJ. Determinants of case selection at morning report. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 263 -6.

10. Recht L, Kramer P, Schwartz W. Morning report in computer era: tradition meets technology. Med Teach. 1995; 17 (3): 327 -31.

11. DeGroot LJ, Siegler M. The morning-report syndrome and medical search. N Engl J Med 1979; 301 (23): 1285 -7.

12. Wartman SA. Morning report revisited: a new model reflecting medical practice of the 1990s. J Gen Intern Med 1995; 10: 271 -2.

13. Silverman HJ. Description of an ethics curriculum for a medicine residency program. West J Med. 1999; 170: 228 -31.

14. Schiffman F, Mayo-Smith M, Burton M. Resident report: A conference with many uses. Rhode Island Med J. 1990; 73: 95 -102.

15. Reilly B, Lemon M. Evidence-based morning report: a popular new format in a large teaching hospital. Am J Med 1997; 103 (5): 419-26.

16. Gross, Cary. Donnelly, Gerard. Reisman, Anna. Resident Expectations of Morning Report. ARCH INTERN MED1999;159 (16): 1910-1914.

17. Haghdoost AA, Jalili Z, Asadikaram E. [A survey on status of morning reports in education hospitals in Kerman University of Medical Sciences]. Development steps in medical education Journal 2005; 2 (2): 88-94. [Persian]

18. Fasset RG, Bollipo SJ. Morning report: an Australian experience. eMJA 2006; 184 (4): 159-161.

19. Razavi SM, Shahbaz Ghazvini S, Dabiran S. [Students’ Benefit Rate from Morning Report Sessions and Its Related Factors in Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2012; 11 (7): 798-806. [Persian]

20. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 1995; 310 (6987): 1122-6.

21. Belsey J. What is Evidence-Based Medicine? Second edition. [Citd 2011 Dec 12]. Availablefrom:http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/ebm.Pdf

22. Youssef MAFM. Is evidence based medicine (EBM) applicable in our real life? Middle East Fertility Society Journal 2013; 18(3): 217–219.

23. Abu-Gharbieh E, Al Khalidi D, Baig RM, Khan AS. Refining knowledge, attitude and practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) among pharmacy students for professional challenges. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal2015; 23 (2): 162–166.

24. Weberschock TB, Ginn TC, Reinhold J, Strametz R, Krug D, Bergold M, et al. Change in knowledge and skills of Year 3 undergraduates in evidence-based medicine seminars. Med Educ 2005; 39 (7): 665-71.

25. Cayley WE Jr. Evidence-based medicine for medical students: introducing EBM in a primary care rotation. WMJ 2005; 104 (3): 34-7.

26. Srinivasan M, Weiner M, Breitfeld PP, Brahmi F, Dickerson KL, Weiner G. Early introduction of an evidence-based medicine course to preclinical medical students. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17 (1): 58-65.

27. Shaneyfelt T, Baum KD, Bell D, Feldstein D, Houston TK, Kaatz S, et al. Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296 (9): 1116- 27.

28. Sadeghi M, Khanjani N, Motamedi F. [Knowledge, Attitude and Application of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) among Residents of Kerman Medical Sciences University]. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 7 (3): 20-26. [Persian]

29. Mahasti Jouybari L, Cheraghali F, Padash L, Sanagoo A. Effect of Participation in the Principles of the Morning Report Case Presentation Workshop on Clinical Faculty Members' Performance. FMEJ 2012; 2 (1): 12-16.

30. Schwartz A, Hupert J, Elstein AS, Noronha P. Evidence-based morning report for inpatient pediatrics rotations. Acad Med 2000; 75 (12): 1229.

31. Zare s, Behnamfar Z, BehnamfarZ,Mirjalili MR. [A survey on quality of morning reports in shahidsadooghi education hospital of Yazd]. Journal of medical education and development center of Yazd 2008; 2 (2): 56-60. [Persian]

32. Rahnavardi M, Bikdeli B, Vahedi H, Alaei F, Pourmalek F, Amini A, et al. [Morning report: a survey of Iranian senior faculty attitudes]. Intern Emerg Med 2008; 3 (1): 17-24. [Persian]

Send email to the article author

‎ 10.18869/acadpub.rme.8.1.47

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Farhadifar F, Bahrami M, Yousefi F, Farazi E, Bahrami A. Comparative Study of Morning Report in Conventional & Evidence Based Medicine forms, from the Viewpoint of Medical Students. RME 2016; 8 (1) :47-56
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-261-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 8, Issue 1 (2016)

Back to browse issues page