:: Volume 13, Issue 3 (2021) ::
RME 2021, 13(3): 18-29 Back to browse issues page
Evaluating the Competencies of Faculty Members of Medical Sciences Universities in the International Interactions: A Strategy toward Internationalization
M Nazarzadeh Zare *
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran , Nazarzadezare@malayeru.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1147 Views)
Introduction: Having interaction at the international level requires having the necessary competencies in this field. For this reason, a faculty member must have the necessary competencies in the international arena. Thus, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the competencies of faculty members of selected medical sciences universities in international interactions. 
Method: This study was conducted with the quantitative approach by cross-sectional survey method.  ​In the study, 257 faculty members of the medical sciences universities of Tehran, Shiraz, Mashhad, Tabriz, and Esfahan in five clusters (North, South, East, West, and Center) by cluster sampling method and during four months in 2020 were selected. The tool used for data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire that was sent electronically to the faculty members byGoogle Form. The validity  and reliability of the questionnaire were confirmed by two experts in the field of competency and Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.84 respectively. The data by statistical methods including, measures of skewness and kurtosis to check the normality, also a one-sample t-test was used by SPSS were analyzed.
Result: Of the 257 faculty members who participated in the study, 52.1% were male and 47.9% were female. Findings showed that the standard deviation ± mean of the component of professional competency was 0.5910±3.38,the communication competency 0.6709±3.08, the intercultural competency 0.5854±3.84, and the intellectual competency 0.5058 ± 3.61, ​and considering the value of t at the level (p = 0.01), these findings were significant.
Conclusion: Given the faculty members of selected medical universities have the necessary competencies in the field of international interaction, it seems to pay attention to the mechanisms such as concluding memorandums of cooperation with prominent foreign universities, as well as, considering more points for the faculty members 'international activities in the promotion regulations can help to increase faculty members' international interactions.
Keywords: Competency, International interactions, Internationalization, Faculty member, Medical sciences, university
Full-Text [PDF 615 kb]   (451 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Educational Adminstration
1. Litz D. Globalization and the Changing Face of Educational Leadership: Current Trends and Emerging Dilemmas. International Education Studies 2011; 4 (1): 47- 61. [DOI:10.5539/ies.v4n3p47]
2. Larkin AM. Internationalizing Canadian higher education through north- south partnerships: a critical case study of policy enactment and programming practices in Tanzania [dissertation] University of Western Ontario: Ontario, Canada; 2015.
3. Nyangau JZ. Motivations of faculty engagement in internationalization: An agenda for future research. Forum for International Research in Education 2018; 4 (3): 7- 32. [DOI:10.32865/fire2018431]
4. Wang R, BrckaLorenz A. A Comparison of International Students' Engagement and Faculty Perceptions of International Student Engagement. American Educational Research Conference; 2017 April; San Antonio, TX, USA: 2017.
5. Nekhoroshkov V, Kobeleva A, Komkova E, Krutko E. Internationalization of Higher Education in Russia: A Case Study of Siberian Transport University. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 2019; 333 (1); 500- 505. [DOI:10.2991/hssnpp-19.2019.94]
6. Sa MJ, Serpa S. Cultural Dimension in Internationalization of the Curriculum in Higher Education. Education Sciences 2020; 10 (12): 1- 11. [DOI:10.3390/educsci10120375]
7. Knight J. Internationalization Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education 2004;8 (1): 5- 31. [DOI:10.1177/1028315303260832]
8. OECD.Internationalization of higher education in Italy, in Supporting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Higher Education in Italy. Paris. OECD Publishing; 2019.
9. Altbach P, Knight J. The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education 2007; (11): 290- 305. [DOI:10.1177/1028315307303542]
10. Reif R.MIT's approach to international engagement. MIT Faculty Newsletter 2011; 23 (3): 8- 16. [DOI:10.1007/BF03360046]
11. Beatty M. Factors influencing faculty participation in internationalization at the University of Minnesota's, Schools of Nursing and Public Health: A Case Study [dissertation] .University of Minnesota;2013.
12. Helms RM. Internationalization in action: engaging faculty in internationalization. Part 1. Washington DC: American Council on Education Leadership and Advocacy; , 2015.
13. Proctor D. Faculty and international engagement: has internationalization changed academic work. International HigherEducation 2015; 83: 15- 17. [DOI:10.6017/ihe.2015.83.9082]
14. AllenG. Role of faculty in international education. International Programs, University of Minnesota; 2015.
15. Aghababaei Dehaghani Z, Ghadamifar H, Torabi R. Investigation competency effects of information systems on management information systems (MIS) based on garner model (Case Study: Melli Banks of Borojen Township).Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences (Online) 2014; 4 (S3); 1236- 1244.
16. Boyatzis RE. Competencies as a behavioral approach to emotional intelligence. Journal of Management Development 2009; 28 (9): 749- 770. [DOI:10.1108/02621710910987647]
17. Chan IYS, Liu AMM, Cao S, Fellows R. Competency and empowerment of project managers in China. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ARCOM Conference; 2013 Sep 2-4; Reading, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM); 2013
18. Nazarzadeh Zare M. [Designing and Explaining a Model of Faculty Members' Competency in Tehran University by Focusing on International Interactions] [dissertation].Tehran: Tehran University; 2016. [Persian]
19. Mohabat H, Fathivajargah K, Jaafari P. [Identifying the Model and Designing the Competencies of the Faculty Members of Universities and Higher Education Institutions of Iran: A Qualitative Study]. Journal of Training & Development of Human Resources 2019; 6 (21): 67- 91. [Persian]
20. Shankara SH, Gowtham N, Surekha P. Faculty Competency Framework: Towards a Better Learning Profession. Procedia Computer Science 2020; 172: 357- 363. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.055]
21. Milner Rj, Gusic ME, Thorndyke LE. Perspective: toward a competency framework for faculty. Academic Medicine 2011; 86 (10): 1204- 1210. [DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822bd524]
22. Abbasi N, Bayazidi E, Oladi B. [Analysis of questionnaire data using SPSS 19 software]. Tehran: Abed Publishing; 2011. [Persian]
23. Malmqvist J, Gunnarsson S, Vigild M. Faculty ProfessionalCompetence Development Programs- Comparing Approachesfrom Three Universities. Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference; 2008June 16- 19; Hoogeschool Gent, Gent: Belgium;2008.
24. Farasatkhah M. [Higher Education in Iran: A Study of Trends, Issues and Challenges, with Emphasis on Strategies for Creating a Good Future]. Tehran. Higher Education Research and Planning Institute;2015 [Persian]
25. Nazarzadeh Zare M, Pourkarimi J, Abili KH, Zakersalehi GH. [Presenting a Pattern for Faculty Members' Competency in the International Engagements: a Phenomenological Study].Jouranl of Science and Technology Policy (JSTP) 2016; 8 (3): 25- 38. [Persian]
26. Jahanbani J. [Non-verbal communication of dentistry students of Kerman University of MedicalSciencesdentistry School]. Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 18 (3): 202- 206. [Persian]
27. Hamidi Y,Barati M. [Communication skills of heads of departments: verbal, listening, and feedback skills]. JRHS 2011;11(2):91-6.[Persian]
28. Javdani M, Haydari Z, Anarinejad A. [Designing And Validation Of Professional Competencies Model Of Faculty Members Of Farhangian University]. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration 2020; 11 (4): 297- 322. [Persian]
29. Chen G M. A model of global communication competence. China Media Research2005; 1(1): 3- 11.
30. Itani R. Intercultural competence developed through transnational teaching experiences in Qatar: a narrative analysis [dissertation]. Boston:Northeastern University; 2017.
31. Bennett JM. Developing intercultural competence for international education faculty and staff. Association of International Education Administrators Conference; 2011 Feb 20-23; AIEA; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2011.
32. Punturat S, Suwannoi P, Ketchatturat J . Intellectual Skills Assessment for the Teacher Students at the Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014; 116: 1704- 1708. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.459]
33. Hatami J, Ahmadzade B, Fathiazar E. [University professor's views on the application of critical thinking on teaching process]. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2013; 19 (3): 103- 119. [Persian]
34. Pefianco EC. Competency standards for 21st Century Teachers in Southeast Asia. 12th Unesco- Apeid International Conference the Impact exhibition & convention center; 2009 26 March; Bangkok, Thailand; 2009.
35. Mashinchi A, Hashemi S, Mohammad Khani K. [A Model for Competency Assessment of the Faculty in Islamic Azad University]. International Education Studies 2017; 10 (3); 76- 88.[Persian] [DOI:10.5539/ies.v10n3p76]

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 13, Issue 3 (2021) Back to browse issues page