[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2019) ::
rme 2019, 11(1): 3-9 Back to browse issues page
Dentistry Students´ Viewpoints about Evaluation of Faculty members during and at the end of Semester in 2016
M Basirat , S Motevasseli , N Mirfarhadi , M Taheri *
Medical Education Rresearch Center (MERC), Educational Development Center (EDC), Guilan University of Medical Sciences,Rasht,Iran , taheri1049@gmail.com
Abstract:   (893 Views)
Introduction: Regular assessment of teachers' quality of teaching has important role in improving and modifying teaching styles and finally promoting quality of education in the university. The purpose of this study is to compare the assessment results of the faculty members of dentistry school during and at the end of second semester in 2016 from the students´ viewpoints.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on 30 faculty members that were evaluated by at least 15 students through completing teacher evaluation questionnaire in the second semester in 2016. The instrument of the study was a questionnaire prepared by the educational development center of the university and evaluation has been done during and at the end of the second semester. Data were analyzed by Descriptive statistics, T-test and kruskal-Wallis tests through SPSS.
Results: there was no significant differences (p = 0.206) between the mean score of the faculty members assessment during (3.41 ± 0.38) and at the end of the second semester (3.3 ± 0.24). But there was significant differences in mean score of the questions (scientific expertise (p=0.001), presenting subjects (p=0.032), regulating sequence and priority in presenting subjects(p=0.020),  regular and on time attendance (p=0.007), ability to classroom management(p=0.032) during and at the end of semester. there was not any significant differences between the students' academic term and the mean score of professors during and at the end of the semester.
Conclusion: based on results, there was no significant differences between mean evaluation scores of faculty members during and at the end of semester. It seems that various factors such as taxonomy of the questions at the end of course and difficulty or easiness of exam questions are effective in evaluating the faculty members' assessment scores. By considering that student assessment is one of the effective factors in promoting professors, other effective complementary practices should be used to evaluate including peer evaluation, self-assessment.
Keywords: assessment, Faculty Member, students
Full-Text [PDF 613 kb]   (211 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: assessment and evaluation
References
1. Asgari H, Ashoorion V, Ehsanpour S. [Teaching and evaluation of field training course for health services management undergraduates: conventional and logbook methods]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2016; 16: 552-60. [Persian]
2. Banisi P, Delfan Azari Gh. [The effect of professors'evaluation on teaching quality improvement of faculty members of Islamic Azad University in region 12]. Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2010; 2(5): 36-47. [Persian]
3. Shakurnia A, Motlagh M E, Malayeri A R, Jouhanmardi A, Komaili Sani H. [Students' Opinion on Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation in Jondishapoor Medical University]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2005; 5 (2) :101-110. [Persian]
4. Hasanzadeh Taheri MM, Riyasari HR, Miri MR, Davari MH, Hajiabadi MR. [Survey of observing of educational rules and regulations by educational staffs in different faculties of Birjand University of Medical Sciences]. J Birjand Uni Med Sci 2009;16(1): 58-64. [Persian]
5. Motlagh ME, Jahanmardi A. [Student Ratings of Instruction: True or False] . Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2002; 2 :39-40. [Persian]
6. Rafiei M, Mosayebi G. [Results of six years professors' evaluation in Arak University of Medical Sciences]. J Arak Uni Med Sci 2010; 12 (4) :52-62. [Persian]
7. Afshar M, Hasanzadeh Taheri M, Ryasi H, Naseri M. [Evaluation of faculty members by students with different educational development]. J Birjand Univ Med Sci 2010; 17 (2):118-126. [Persian]
8. Moezi M, Shirzad H, Zamanzad B, Roohi H. [Faculty members and students viewpoints about evaluation of professors and criteria affecting professors' teaching in Shahr-e-Kord Medical Science University]. Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences Journal 2010;11(4):63-75. [Persian]
9. Rama S. Professor's performance for effective teaching (Kosovo case). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011 ;1(12): 117-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.015]
10. Aghamirzaee, Salehi Omran E, Rahimpour Kami B. [Effective Factors on Student Evaluation of Faculty Members Performance]. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences 2014; 7 (1): 57-62. [Persian]
11. Tahmasbi S, Vallian A, Moezzyzadeh M. The correlation between the students' & authorities' ratings for faculty evaluation in Shahid beheshti School of Dentistry. J Dent Sch 2012; 29 (5): 358-365.
12. Arabi Mianroodi A, Asgari Baravati Z, Khanjani N. [Explaining the pros and cons of different sources of Faculty Evaluation from the viewpoints of Medical University Academics]. Strides Dev Med Educ 2012; 9 (1): 65-76. [Persian]
13. Vakily A, Haji Aghajany S, Rashideepour A, Ghorbani R. [Factors affecting teachers 'evaluation of students' perspective]. Koomesh 2010; 2(38): 93-103. [Persian]
14. Nejad Shamsi P, Zaker-Jafari HR, Basirat M, Zaker-Jafari A.[Self-Assessment of Senior Dental Students about Acquired Skills Based on the Educational Program]. rme 2017; 9 (3) :78-73. [Persian]
15. Amini M,Honardar M. [The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences]. Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences 2008;9(3):171-178 . [Persian]
16. Tork zadeh J, Marzoghi R, Mohammadi M, Mohtaram M. [Factors Affecting the Evaluation of Teachers from Students' Viewpoints]. Journal of Educational Measurement & Evaluation Studies 2014; 4 (7):130-164. [Persian]
17. Pakkies NE, Mtshali NG. Students' views on the block evaluation process: A descriptive analysis. curationis 2016; 39 (1):1-8. [DOI:10.4102/curationis.v39i1.1516]
18. Annan SL, Tratnack S, Rubenstein C, Metzler-Sawin E, Hulton L. An integrative review of student evaluations of teaching: Implications for evaluation of nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing 2013 ; 29 (5):e10-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.06.004]
19. Hassanein S, Abdrbo A, Al Ateeq E. Student evaluation of faculty at college of nursing. International conference on management and education innovation. International proceedings of economics development and research (IPEDR) 2012; 37 :117-122
20. Schiekirka S, Reinhardt D, Heim S, Fabry G, Pukrop T, Anders S, Raupach T. Student perceptions of evaluation in undergraduate medical education: A qualitative study from one medical school. BMC medical education 2012; 12(1): 45. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-12-45]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Basirat M, Motevasseli S, Mirfarhadi N, Taheri M. Dentistry Students´ Viewpoints about Evaluation of Faculty members during and at the end of Semester in 2016. rme. 2019; 11 (1) :3-9
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-721-en.html


Volume 11, Issue 1 (3-2019) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education