[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 11, Issue 3 (2019) ::
rme 2019, 11(3): 30-38 Back to browse issues page
Comparison the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods of Case based Discussion and logbooks on satisfaction of nursing students
GH Zarifnejad , M Rajabpoor , S Sharafi * , M Mohsenizadeh , A Nejat-Mohammad
PhD candidate in Nursing, Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran , siminsharafi68@gmail.com
Abstract:   (589 Views)
Introduction: clinical education is the most fundamental part of nursing training, so appropriate evaluation methods should be used. Although various evaluation methods such as case based discussion and logbooks, each one has its own advantages and limitations, this study had designed aimed to comparison of the effect of clinical evaluation method with case based discussion and logbooks On satisfaction of nursing students.
Methods: This experimental study with two groups after the intervention was conducted in 2017. Participants were 58 nursing students of Mashhad nursing and midwifery school that draw on both the patient discussion and log books by random assignment. Students' satisfaction was measured by researcher- made questionnaire that its´ reliability and content validity was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha and using expert opinion, respectively. Data were analyzed using independent and paired T-tests and Mann-Whitney through SPSS.
Results: The results showed that the mean and standard deviation of students' satisfaction of case based discussion group was 69/06 ± 22/7 (of 100) and logbook 67/8 ± 21/8 (of 100). Results of Independent T test showed no significant differences between the two groups in satisfaction score (p=0/757). Although students' satisfaction of case based discussion group in suitability field was statistical significant higher than the other group (p= 0/018).
Conclusion: Considering the students´ higher satisfaction of case based discussion method, it seems this method has somehow achieved the expectations of students compared to the logbook method. However, due to insignificant results, studies with a larger sample size and devoting more time to implement this method is necessary.
Keywords: clinical evaluation, case based discussion, log-book
Full-Text [PDF 378 kb]   (125 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: assessment and evaluation
1. Asadizaker M, Abedsaeedi Z, Abedi H, Alijanirenani H, Moradi M, Jahani S. Improvement of the first training for baccalaureate nursing students-a mutual approach. Glob J Health Sci 2015; 7 (7): 79- 92. [DOI:10.5539/gjhs.v7n7p79]
2. Kouhpayezadeh J, Dargahi H, Soltani ArabshahiK. [Clinical assessment methods in medical sciences universities of Tehran - clinical instructors' viewpoint]. Medical Journal of Hormozgan University 2013; 16 (5):395-402. [Persian]
3. Sabzevari S, Abbaszadeh A, Borhani F. [Perception of nursing faculties from clinical assessment challenges in students: A qualitative study]. Strides in development of medical education 2013; 10(3): 385- 397. [Persian]
4. Imanipour M, Jalili M. [Nursing students' clinical evaluation in students and teachers views]. IJNR 2012; 7(25): 17- 26. [Persian]
5. W Enskär, C Lee، W Wang. A systematic review of clinical assessment for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today 2015;35 (2): 347- 359. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.016]
6. Santos JLG, Pestana AL، Guerrero P, Klock P, Erdmann AL. Logbook: experience of teachinglearning management and management in nursing and health. Northeast Network Nursing Journal 2013; 14 (4): 854- 63.
7. Latifi M, Shaban M, Nikbakht A,، Mehran A, ParsaYekta Z. [Comparison of the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods: Portfolio and popular, on satisfaction of nurse students]. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research 2011; 6 (21): 15- 28. [Persian]
8. Hakim A. [Factors affecting satisfaction of nursing students of nursing major]. Journal of Nursing Education 2013; 2 (2): 10- 20. [Persian]
9. Hoseini BL, Jafarnejad F, Mazloum SR, Foroughipour M, Karimi Mouneghi H. [Midwifery Students' Satisfaction with Logbook as a Clinical Assessment Means in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2010]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2012; 11 (8): 933- 941. [Persian]
10. Yousefzadeh S, Golmakani N. [The Midwifery Students' Perspective about Clinical Evaluation Based on Log book.jgbfnm] 2012; 9 (1): 103- 111. [Persian]
11. Azizi M, Barati H، Khamse F, Barati M, Alizadeh A. [The effect of log book design and implementation on students' satisfaction and performance during a nursing internship course in a military psychiatric hospital]. Ebnesina 2016; 18 (2): 58-63. [Persian]
12. Ghanbari A, Monfared A. [Survey Of clinical evaluation process based on logbook and cognitive and psychomotor learning in nursing students]. Research in Medical Education 2014; 6 (2): 28- 35. [Persian] [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.6.2.28]
13. Honarmand M. [Comparing the influence of log book on the scores of practical oral medicine Course gained by students of general dentistry]. Future of Medical Education Journal 2013; 3 (4): 3- 5. [Persian]
14. Khazaee Z, Khazaee T, Ghannadkafi M, Zaher Ibrahimi M. [The effect of using the obstetrics and gynecology logbook on the clinical skills of interns and trainees]. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2013; 10 (2): 225- 31. [Persian]
15. Heidari H, Akbari N. Developing and implementing logbook in teaching principles and techniques to nursing and midwifery students: mixed method study. Future of Medical Education Journal 2017; 7 (1): 14- 8. [DOI:10.12968/htup.2017.1.14]
16. Asgari H, Ashoorion V, Ehsanpour S. [Teaching and evaluation of field training course for health services management undergraduates: conventional and logbook methods].Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2017; 16(61): 552-60. [Persian]
17. Epstein, RM. Assessment in Medical Education. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 356 (4): 387- 396. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMra054784]
18. Fulya M, Shwan NJ. Do trainees value feedback in case-based discussion assessments? Medical Teacher 2013; 35(5):e1166-72. [DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.731100]
19. Williamson JML. Critical Analysis of Case Based Discussions. British Journal of Medical Practitioner 2012; 5 (2): 514- 517.
20. Sidakpal S. Panaich Th Case-Based Discussion Regarding Challenges in Patient Selection and Procedural Planning in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2018; 93(5):630-638. [DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.03.015]
21. PishkarMofrad Z, Robabi H. [An assessment of traditional and objective structured practical evaluation methods on satisfaction of nursing students in Zahedan Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery: A comparing]. Journal of Medical Education and Development 2013; 7(4): 2-14. [Persian]
22. Farajpour A, Amini M, Pishbin E, Arshadi H, Sanjarmusavi N, Yousefi J, et al. [ Teachers' and Students' Satisfaction with DOPS Examination in Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, a Study in Year 2012]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2014; 14 (2): 165- 173. [Persian]
23. Habibi H, Khaghanizade M, Mahmoodi H, Ebadi A, Seyedmazhari M. [Comparison of the Effects of Modern Assessment Methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) with traditional method on Nursing Students' Clinical Skills: A Randomized Trial]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2013; 13 (5): 364- 372. [Persian]
24. Durak HI, Caliskan SA, Bor S, Van Der Vleuten C. Use of case-based exams as an instructional teaching tool to teach clinical reasoning. Medical teacher 2007; 29(6): e 170-174. [DOI:10.1080/01421590701506866]
25. Carrero E, Gomar C, Penzo W, Fábregas N, Valero R, Etayo G. Teaching basic life support algorithms by either multimedia presentations or case based discussion equally improves the level of cognitive skills of undergraduate medical students.Medical Teacher 2009; 31(5):e189-95. [DOI:10.1080/01421590802512896]
26. Najafi F, Kermansaravi F, Mirmortazavi M, Gheisaranpour H. [The Efficacy of Logbook in Clinical Wards from the Viewpoints of Nursing Faculty Members and Students]. rme. 2017; 9 (3): 64- 55. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/rme.9.3.64]
27. Movaffaghi Z, Shoeibi A, Bahari A, Khajedaluee M. [The efficiency of medical extern's logbook from the viewpoints of externs and faculties of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences: An integration of qualitative and quantitative methods]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2014; 13 (11): 950- 9. [Persian]
Send email to the article author

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zarifnejad G, Rajabpoor M, Sharafi S, Mohsenizadeh M, Nejat-Mohammad A. Comparison the effect of clinical evaluation by two methods of Case based Discussion and logbooks on satisfaction of nursing students. rme. 2019; 11 (3) :30-38
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-780-en.html

Volume 11, Issue 3 (2019) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education