[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 8, Number 3 (10-2016) ::
Research in Medical Education 2016, 8(3): 34-44 Back to browse issues page
Effective Factors on Postgraduate Students Research experience in Kerman University of Medical Sciences
S Noori Hekmat, M Rezaei, R Dehnavieh *
Research Center for Modeling in Health, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , rdehnavi@gmail.com
Abstract:   (893 Views)

Background: Today majority of researches in universities of medical sciences belong to post graduates students, thus qualitative assessment of current situation dominated on research in post graduates courses as well as evaluation of research experiences  and students expectation of teachers is very important. This study was conducted to evaluate postgraduate students research experience in Kerman university of Medical Sciences.

Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive-analytic  study, 105 postgraduate students participated. Data were collected using standard Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire (PREQ) in 4 domains of supervision, practical skills, perceptual skills and organizational climate . The effect of variables on students evaluation of research experience by using, chi-square tests, t-test, Anova, Tukey, pearson correlation and linear- regression has been done .

Results: The  mean score for the postgraduate students research experience was 3.22±0.42 of 5 and their satisfaction of 4 dimensions including supervision, practical skills development, perceptual skills development and intellectual climate were 3.03±0.7, 3.57±0.79, 3.48±0.61, 2.44±0.78 respectively. There was a positive relationship between all factors also correlation between dimensions of "promoting cognitive skills" with "improving practical skills" and "organizational climate", was significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion: based on results Most postgraduate students declare their fair satisfaction of research experience in  faculties of kerman universities of medical sciences. continuous and effective application  for  evaluating students research experience could provide situation for identifying strengths and weaknesses in research and educational processes in faculties and universities.

Keywords: Research, Experience, Students, Postgraduate, Questionnaire
Full-Text [PDF 808 kb]   (532 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
1. Montazer Gholam A. [University position]. National Research Institute fo Science Policy, Tehran:Iran; 2008. [persian]
2. Behzadi H, Davarpanah MR. [Factors Influencing the Research Experience of the Graduate Students at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad]. Studies in Education & Psychology 2009;10 (2): 227-50
3. Hodsdon L, Buckley A. Postgraduate research experience survey: 2011 results. York: The Higher Education; 2011.
4. Faely S, Pezeshki Rad G, Chizari M. [The Survey of Effective Factors on Students’ Contribution in Research Activities and Scientific Production]. Quarterly journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2007; 12 (4) :93-124. [persian]
5. Mansuri S, Izadi S, Abedini M.[Postgraduate students’ involvement in the knowledge production in Iran]. Developement of Postgraduate Education; 2013; Tehran, Iran: 5th International Conference of Iranian Higher Education Association: Tehran, 2013 [persian]
6. Jamali HR. [Impact Assessment of Medical Research: Models & Methods]. [Dissertation]. Tehran: Islamic repoblic of Iran: The Academy of Medical Sciences; 2012. [persian]
7. Informatics Centre. Annual Statictics Report 2014. Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Kerman, Iran, 2013. available from : http://it.kmu.ac.ir/Default2.aspx?Id=8433 access date: 23th Jan.
8. Yamaniduzi-Sorkhabi M, Mozafari-Farugh A. [Influencing Factors on postgraduate research experience in Shahid Beheshti University]. Education and Psychology Studies 2009;10(1):83-100. [persian]
9. Chehree A. [Sampling and Sample Size Calculation in Medical Research]. 1st ed. Tehran: Pejvak-e-Elme Aria: 2007. [persian]
10. Park C, Hanbury A, Kulej M. Postgraduate research experience survey2007. Final Report. York: Higher Education Academy:2007.
11. Marsh HW, Rowe KJ, Martin A. PhD students' evaluations of research supervision: issues, complexities, and challenges in a nationwide Australian experiment in benchmarking universities. Journal of Higher Education 2002; 73(3): 313-48.
12. Geravand H, Karashki H, Anchiab MR. [Social Factors Influence on postgraduate students’ research experiences in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences]. Developement of Postgraduate Education; 2013; Tehran, Iran: 5th International Conference of Iranian Higher Education Association , Tehran, 2013 [persian]
13. Mabrouk PA, Peters K. Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Quarterly 2000; 21 (1): 25-33.
14. Drennan J, Clarke M. Coursework master’s programmes: the student’s experience of research and research supervision. Studies in Higher Education 2009; 34 (5): 483-500.
15. Hodsdon L, Buckley A. Postgraduate research experience survey: 2011 results. 2011; (Report) 23-78.available from http://www. heacademy. ac. uk/assets/ documents /pos tgra duate /PRES _ report_2011.pdf
16. Nakhaee N, Najafipour H, Rohani A, Raftari S, Mobasher M, Hasani F. [Proposing Disciplinary Charter of Research Misconduct: a Qualitative Study]. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2010;7 (1):1-8. [persian]
17. Nakhaee N, Nikpour H. [Investigation of medical students’ opinions on research fraud in thesis and its frequency]. Strides in Development of Medical Education 2005;2 (1):10-17. [persian]
18. Park C. The research student experience Lessons from PRES. York: Higher Education Authority 2009 (Annual Report) 12-13.
19. Wilson A, Howitt S, Wilson K, Roberts P. Academics' perceptions of the purpose of undergraduate research experiences in a research-intensive degree. Studies in Higher Education 2012;37(5): 513-26.
20. Talukdar J, Aspland T, Datta P. Australian higher education and the Course experience questionnaire: Insights, implications and recommendations. Australian Universities' Review, The 2013; 55 (1): 27.
21. Calma A. Postgraduate Supervision in the Philippines: Setting the Research Agenda. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 2007; 16 (2) : 91–100.
22. Abdelhafez AM. Postgraduate research students’ knowledge and attitudes towards good supervisory practice at the University of Exeter. ERIC; 2007.
23. Adedokun OA, Bessenbacher AB, Parker LC, Kirkham LL, Burgess WD. Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students' aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self‐efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2013;50 (8): 940-51.
24. Fan S, Babaee M, editors. The creative and innovative aspects of e-protfolio for researchers and postgraduate research students to conduct research. 5th International conference on education and new learning technologies; 2013.
25. Ginns P, Prosser M, Barrie S. Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: The perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education 2007; 32 (5): 603-15.
26. Houser C, Lemmons K, Cahill A. Role of the Faculty Mentor in an Undergraduate Research Experience. Journal of Geoscience Education 2013; 61 (3):297-305.
27. Mahmud S, Bretag T. Postgraduate research students and academic integrity:‘It's about good research training’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2013; 35 (4): 432-43.
28. Nasiri F, Mafakheri F. Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: a review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education 2014 :1962-1969. available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
29. Venning J, Buisman-Pijlman F. Integrating assessment matrices in feedback loops to promote research skill development in postgraduate research projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2013; 38 (5):567-79.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or email:

Write the security code in the box >

DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.rme.8.3.34

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Noori Hekmat S, Rezaei M, Dehnavieh R. Effective Factors on Postgraduate Students Research experience in Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education. 2016; 8 (3) :34-44
URL: http://rme.gums.ac.ir/article-1-351-en.html
Volume 8, Number 3 (10-2016) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش در آموزش علوم پزشکی Research in Medical Education